Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:41:11.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Methane/water Adsorption Properties of Synthetic Imogolite Nanotubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Fumihiko Ohashi
Affiliation:
Materials Research Institute for Sustainable Development, AIST Chubu, Shimo-Shidami, Moriyama, Nagoya 463-8560, JAPAN
Shinji Tomura
Affiliation:
Materials Research Institute for Sustainable Development, AIST Chubu, Shimo-Shidami, Moriyama, Nagoya 463-8560, JAPAN
Shin-Ichiro Wada
Affiliation:
Agricultural Department, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Higashi, Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812-8581, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

Aluminosilicate nanotubes (imogolite) have been synthesized from highly concentrated inorganic solutions by hydrothermal treatment. These can be converted to microporous nanofibers with a pore radius in the range of 0.3-0.6 nm referring to the results from the nitrogen adsorption isotherm. The water vapor adsorption isotherms indicated that the natural imogolite plotted a proportional isothermal curve where the amount of adsorbed water increased in proportion to P/P0: the maximum amount of adsorbed water was ca. 60 wt%. The synthetic imogolite showed a rapid increase at 0.9-0.95 range of P/P0 and achieved a maximum of ca. 80 wt%, with a better methane storage property than that of the usual compressed natural gas storage. In order to obtain a high ratio of water adsorption and a large methane storage capacity, it is necessary to control the micro/meso porous structure and the hydrophilic/hydrophobic surface affinity. It is expected that the synthetic imogolite might become a multipurpose adsorbent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cradwick, P. D. G., Farmer, V. C., Russell, J. D., Masson, C. R., Wada, K. and Yoshinaga, N., Nature Phys. Sci., 240, 187 (1972).Google Scholar
2 Wada, K. and Yoshinaga, N., Amer. Miner., 54, 1969 (1969).Google Scholar
3 Yoshinaga, N. and Aomine, S., Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.,8, 22 (1962).Google Scholar
4 Henmi, T. and Wada, K., Clay Miner., 10, 231 (1974).Google Scholar
5 Russell, J. D., McHardy, W. J. and Fraser, A. R., Clay Miner., 8, 87 (1969).Google Scholar
6 Gaast, S. J., Wada, K., Wada, S-I., and Kakuto, Y., Clays Clay Mimer. 33, 237 (1985).Google Scholar
7 Farmer, V. C., Fraser, A. R. and Tait, J. M., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 462 (1977).Google Scholar
8 Farmer, V. C., Adams, M. J., Fraser, A. R. and Palmieri, F., Clay Miner., 18, 459 (1983).Google Scholar
9 Iijima, S., Nature, 354, 56 (1991).Google Scholar
10 Chopra, N. G., Luyken, R. J., Cherry, K., Crespi, V. H., Cohen, M. L., Louie, S. G. and Zettl, A., Science, 269, 966 (1995).Google Scholar
11 Satishkumar, B. C., Govindaraj, A., Voli, E. M., Basumallic, L. and Rao, C. N. R., J. Mater. Res., 12, 604 (1997).Google Scholar
12 Iijima, S., Ichihashi, T., Nature, 363, 603 (1993).Google Scholar
13 Chambers, A., Park, C., Baker, R. T. K. and Rodriguez, N. M., J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 4253 (1998).Google Scholar
14 Horvath, G. and Kawazoe, K., J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 16, 470 (1983).Google Scholar
15 Jaymes, I., Douy, A. Massiot, D. and Busnel, J-P, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 78, 2648 (1995).Google Scholar