Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:17:13.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metastable Activation in Rapid Thermal Annealed Arsenic Implanted Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Avid Kamgar  and
F. A. Baiocchi
Avid Kamgar
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
F. A. Baiocchi
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Get access

Abstract

Low temperature (600–800&C) thermal treatment subsequent to high temperature short time anneal of As implanted Si has resulted in significant clustering of As atoms in Si. Si wafers implanted with As at a variety of doses and energies were subjected to single and multiple thermal anneals using incoherent tungsten radiation. Sheet resistance (R▩ ), and Rutherford backscattering (RBS) and channeling measurements were carried out on the wafers. The metastable behavior observed in the activation of As was attributed to electrical deactivation of As atoms caused by clustering. From the temperature dependence of the rate of increase in R▩ we extracted a value of 1.1 eV for the activation energy of electronic deactivation of As atoms in agreement with the value obtained earlier for the activation of As clustering. We also report, for the first time, observation of a structure in the Si RBS spectrum which represents a defective layer in Si caused by the clustering As atoms.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 52: Symposium B – Rapid Thermal Processing , 1985 , 23
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Kamgar, A., Baiocchi, F. A., and Sheng, T. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. (1986).Google Scholar
[2] Tsai, M. Y., Morehead, F. F., Baglin, J. E. E., and Michel, A. E., J. Appl. Phys. 51(6). 3230 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Lietoila, A., Gibbons, J. F., and Sigmon, T. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 765 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Seidel, T. E., Pai, C. S., Lischner, D. J., Maher, D. M., Knoell, R. V., Williams, J. S., Penumalli, B. R. and Jacobson, D. C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 35, 329 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Schwenker, R. O., Pan, E. S., and Lever, R. F., J. Appl. Phys. 42, 3195 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Grinshtein, P. M., Sakharov, B. A., and Fistul, V. I., Soy. Phys.-Semicond. 2, 1142 (1969).Google Scholar