Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:37:53.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanisms and Modelling of Waste/Cement Interactions – Survey of Topics Presented at the Meiringen Workshop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

E. Wieland ,
C.A. Johnson ,
B. Lothenbach  and
F. Winnefeld
E. Wieland
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institut, Nuclear Energy and Safety Research Department, Laboratory for Waste Management, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
C.A. Johnson
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG), 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
B. Lothenbach
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research (Empa), Section Concrete and Construction Chemistry, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
F. Winnefeld
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research (Empa), Section Concrete and Construction Chemistry, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

Cementitious matrices are being used worldwide as a containment medium for radioactive and non-radioactive waste in order to retard the mobility of contaminants. The present thrust of research is to further the understanding of contaminant binding in the cementitious matrix in order to predict the long-term behaviour and the potential impact of the waste on the environment.

The workshop “Mechanisms and Modelling of Waste/Cement Interactions”, held in Meiringen, Switzerland, between May 8 and 12, 2005, focused on the chemical understanding and thermodynamic modelling of the processes responsible for the retention of radioactive and non-radioactive species in cementitious systems. The objectives of the workshop were to bring together scientists from different disciplines, i.e. cement chemistry, radioactive and non-radioactive hazardous waste disposal, to stimulate discussions on current developments and to identify future needs in this field of research. The topics treated in the workshop were chosen to maximize the benefit to the different fields of research. Cement chemists reported on developments in the understanding of cement mineralogy and thermodynamic modelling of cement systems. The hazardous and radioactive waste management communities presented their ideas on the mechanisms of contaminant binding to cement minerals as well as field, laboratory and modelling results from practical applications. In this paper important areas of research on waste/cement interactions presented in the workshop will be outlined and briefly discussed. The following overview reflects a subjective perception of the workshop and does not lay claim to deal comprehensively with all the papers that were presented in the workshop.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 932: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX , 2006 , 50.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Conner, J. R., “Chemical Fixation and Solidification of Hazardous Wastes”, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA, (1990).Google Scholar
2. Batchelor, B., Waste Manage. (2006) (in press).Google Scholar
3. Glasser, F. P., Cem. Concr. Res. 22, 201 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Atkins, M., Glasser, F.P., Moroni, L.P. and Jack, J.J., “Effect of Elevated Temperature on Cement and Blended Cement in Radioactive Waste Isolation”, DoE/HMIP/RR/94.011 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Cocke, D.L. and Mollah, M.Y.A, “The Chemistry and Leaching Mechanisms of Hazardous Substances in Cementitious Solidification/Stabilization Systems”, in Chemistry and Microstructure of Solidified Waste Forms, ed. Spence, R.D. (Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1993) pp. 187–242.Google Scholar
6. Gougar, M.D.L, Scheetz, B.E. and Roy, D.M., Waste Manage. 16, 295 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Glasser, F. P., J. Hazard. Mat. 36, 151 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Taylor, H.F.W., “Cement Chemistry“, Thomas Telford Ltd., London, (1997).Google Scholar
9. Chapman, N. and McCombie, C., “Principles and Standards for the Disposal of Long-Lived Radioactive Wastes“, Elsevier Science, Oxford (2003).Google Scholar
10. Nagra, “The Long-Term Safety of a Repository for Spent Fuel, Vitrified High-Level Waste and Long-Lived Intermediate-Level Waste Sited in the Opalinus Clay of the Zürcher Weinland“, Nagra Technical Report NTB 02-05, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland (2002).Google Scholar
11. Bennett, D.G., Read, D., Atkins, M. and Glasser, F.P., Journal of Nuclear Materials 190, 315 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Berner, U. R., Waste Manage. 12, 201 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Reardon, E.J., Waste Manage. 12, 221 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Lee, J.H., Roy, D.M., Mann, B. and Stahl, D. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, edited by Murakami, T. and Ewing, R.C., (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, Pittsbrugh, PA, 1995) pp. 881–889.Google Scholar
15. Lothenbach, B. and Winnefeld, F., Cem. Concr. Res. 36, 209 (2006).Google Scholar
16. Lothenbach, B., and, B. Wieland, E., Waste Manage. (2006) (in press).Google Scholar
17. Berner, U. R., “Project Opalinus Clay: Radionuclide Concentration Limits in the Near Field of a Repository for Long-Lived Intermediate-Level Waste”, Nagra Technical Report NTB 02-22, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland (2003).Google Scholar
18. Baur, I. and Johnson, C.A., Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 3442 (2003).Google Scholar
19. Ochs, M., Pointeau, I. and Giffault, E., Waste Manage. (2006) (in press).Google Scholar
20. Tits, J., Wieland, E., Müller, C.J., Landesman, C. and Bradbury, M.H., J. Colloid Interface Sci. (2006) (submitted).Google Scholar
21. Nonat, A., Cem. Concr. Res. 34, 1521 (2004).Google Scholar
22. Kulik, D.A. and Kersten, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 3017 (2001).Google Scholar
23. Kulik, D.A. and Kersten, M., Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 2926 (2002).Google Scholar
24. Wang, J., Kalinichev, A.G., Amonette, J.E. and Kirkpatrick, R.J., Am. Miner. 88, 398 (2003).Google Scholar
25. Dijkstra, J.L., Meeussen, J.C.L., Comans, R.N.J., Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 4390 (2004).Google Scholar
26. Lee, J. van der, Windt, L. De, Lagneau, V. and Goblet, P., Computers & Geosciences 29, 265 (2003).Google Scholar
27. Garrabrants, A.C., Sanchez, F. and Kosson, D.S., Waste Manage. 24, 19 (2004).Google Scholar
28. Colombet, P., Grimmer, A.R., Zanni, H., and Sozanni, P., “Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Cement-Based Materials“, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1998).Google Scholar
29. Scrivener, K. L., Cem. Concr. Composites 26, 935 (2004).Google Scholar
30. Scheidegger, A.M., Vespa, M., Grolimund, D., Wieland, E., Harfouche, M., Bonhoure, I., Dähn, R., Waste Manage. (2006) (in press).Google Scholar
31. Rose, J., Bénard, A., Mrabet, S. El, Masion, A., Moulin, I., Briois, V., Olivi, L. and Bottero, J.-Y., Waste Manage. (2006) (in press).Google Scholar
32. Bénard, A., Rose, J., Bottero, J.-Y., Hazemann, J.-L., Trotignon, L., Nonat, A., Vichot, A., Chateau, L. and Guiges, A., Waste Manage. (2006) (in press).Google Scholar
33. Vespa, M., Dähn, R., Grolimund, D., Wieland, E. and Scheidegger, A.M., Environ. Sci. Technol. (2006) (submitted).Google Scholar
34. Rose, J., Bénard, A., Borschneck, S. J. D., Hazemann, J.-L., Vichot, A., Lemarchand, D. and Bottero, J.-Y., Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 4864 (2003).Google Scholar
35. Gallucci, E., Scrivener, K.L., Groso, A., Martigondo, G. and Stampanoni, M., Proceedings of the SLS User's Meeting, Villigen PSI, Switzerland, 2003.Google Scholar
36. Holzer, L., Gasser, P. and Münch, B., Proceedings of the international conference “Cementitious Materials as Model Porous Media: Nanostructure and Transport Processes”;, Monte Verita, Switzerland, pp. 71–76 (2006).Google Scholar
37. Kienzler, B. and Metz, V., Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation. American Society of Mechanical Engineers and Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Glasgow, UK, pp. 1152 (2005).Google Scholar
38. Tits, J., Stumpf, T., Rabung, T., Wieland, E. and Fanghänel, T., Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 3568 (2003).Google Scholar
39. Stumpf, T., Tits, J., Walther, C., Wieland, E. and Fanghänel, T., J. Colloids Interface Sci. 276, 118 (2004).Google Scholar
40. Pointeau, I., Hainos, D., Coreau, N. and Reiller, P., Waste Manage. (2006) (in press).Google Scholar
41. Glaus, M., Laube, A. and Loon, L.R. van. Waste Manage. (2006) (in press).Google Scholar
42. Warwick, P., Evans, N.D.M., Hall, A. and Vines, S., Radiochim. Acta 92, 897 (2004).Google Scholar
43. Adler, M., Mäder, U.K. and Waber, H.N., Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt. 79, 445 (1999).Google Scholar
44. Gaucher, E., Blanc, P., Matray, J.-M. and Michau, N., Appl. Geochemistry 19, 1505 (2004).Google Scholar