Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:56:14.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical grafting and morphology characterization in immiscible polymer blends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jayant Joshi ,
Richard L. Lehman  and
Thomas J. Nosker
Jayant Joshi*
Affiliation:
AMIPP Advanced Polymer Center Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
Richard L. Lehman
Affiliation:
AMIPP Advanced Polymer Center Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
Thomas J. Nosker
Affiliation:
AMIPP Advanced Polymer Center Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
*
email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Blends of PS/HDPE and PS/PP were investigated for synergism in flexural modulus with varying composition. The evolution of blend morphology was studied and related to the improvement in flexural modulus around the co-continuous composition. DSC studies were conducted to study crystallinity variations in the semi-crystalline component of the blend. We found that co-continuous morphologies help in developing strong mechanical bonds between the components. Crystallization is inhibited in the co-continuous region and is related to the spatial constraints during the solidification process.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 856: Symposium BB – Multicomponent Polymer Systems-Phase Behavior, Dynamics, and Applications , 2004 , BB10.10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hara, M. and Sauer, J.A., J. Macromol. Sci.-Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys. C38, 327 (1998)Google Scholar
2. Willemse, R.C., Speijer, A., Langeraar, A.E. and Posthuma de Boer, A., Polymer 40, 6645 (1999)Google Scholar
3. Nosker, T.J., Morrow, D.R., Renfree, R.W., VanNess, K. and Donaghy, J.J., Nature 350, 563 (1991)Google Scholar
4. Joshi, J., Lehman, R.L. and Nosker, T.J., Submitted to Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Sept. 14th, 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
5. Potschke, P. and Paul, D.R., J. Macromol. Sci.-Part C-Polymer Reviews C43, 87 (2003)Google Scholar
6. Veenstra, Harm, Verkooijen, Paul C.J., Lent, Barbara J.J., van Dam, Jaap, de Boer, Albertus P. and Nijhof, Abe Posthuma H.J., Polymer 41, 1817 (2000)Google Scholar
7. Willemse, R.C., Polymer 40, 2175 (1999)Google Scholar
8. Jordhamo, G.M., Manson, J. A. and Sperling, L.H., Polymer Engineering and Science 26, 517 (1986)Google Scholar
9. Chun, Y.S., Jung, H.C., Han, M.S. and Kim, K.W.N., Polymer Engineering and Science 39, 2304 (1999)Google Scholar