Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:57:14.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of Gap and Grain-Boundary Inventories of 129I Used in Candu Fuels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S. Stroes-Gascoyne ,
D. L. Moir ,
M. Kolar ,
R. J. Porth ,
J. L. McConnell  and
A. H. Kerr
S. Stroes-Gascoyne
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Vhiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada
D. L. Moir
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Vhiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada
M. Kolar
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Vhiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada
R. J. Porth
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Vhiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada
J. L. McConnell
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Vhiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada
A. H. Kerr
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Vhiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Combined gap and grain-boundary inventories of 129I in 14 used CANDU fuel elements were measured by crushing and simultaneously leaching fuel segments for 4 h in a solution containing KI carrier. From analogy with previous work a near one-to-one correlation vas anticipated between the amount of stable Xe and the amount of 129I in the combined gap and grain-boundary regions of the fuel. However, the results showed that such a correlation was only apparent for low linear power rating (LLPR) fuels with an average linear power rating of 642 kV/m. For high linear power rating (HLPR) fuels (>44 kw/m), the 129I values were considerably smaller than expected. The combined gap and grain-boundary inventories of 129I in the 14 fuels tested varied from 1.8 to 11.01, with an average value of 3.6 ± 2.4% which suggests that the average value of 8.1 ± 1% used in safety assessment calculations overestimates the instant release fraction for 129I. Segments of used CANDU fuels were leached for 92 d (samples taken at 5, 28 and 92 d) to determine the kinetics of 129I release. Results could be fitted tentatively to half-order reaction kinetics, implying that 129I release is a diffusion-controlled process for LLPR fuels, and also for HLPR fuels, once the gap inventory has been leached. However, more data are needed over longer leaching periods to gain more understanding of the processes that control grain-boundary release of 129I from used CANDU fuel.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 353: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII , 1994 , 625
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dormuth, K.W. and Gillespie, P.A., Atonic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10183 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H. and Sellinger, D.M., Nucl. Technol. 77, 320 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H., Tait, J.C. and Sellinger, D.M., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 127, 301 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Tait, J.C., Garisto, N.C., Porth, R.J., Ross, J.P.M., Glova, G.A. and Barnsdale, T.R., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 257, 373 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Tait, J.C., Porth, R.J., McConnell, J.L., Barnsdale, T.R. and Vatson, S., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 294, 41 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H., Sellinger, D.M/, and Wilkin, D.L., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report AECL-10574 (COG-92–31) (1992).Google Scholar
7. Tait, J.C., Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Porth, R.J., Wood, D. and Heimann, R.B., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 127, 309 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Tait, J.C., Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Hocking, W.H., Duclos, A.M., Porth, R.J. and Wilkin, D.L., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 212, 189 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., J. Nucl. Mat. 190, 87 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Johnson, L.H. and Shoesmith, D.W., In: Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future (Lutze, W. and Eving, R.C., editors) Elsevier Science Publishers: 635 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Garisto, N.C., Johnson, L.H. and Hocking, W.H., In: Second International Conference on CANDU Fuel, Conference Proceedings, Pembroke, Ontario, 352 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Johnson, L.H., Shoesmith, D.V., LeNeveu, D.M., Garisto, N.C., Oscarson, D.W., Gray, M.N. and Lemire, R.J., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report AECL-10714 (C0G-93–04) (1994).Google Scholar
13. Stroes-Gascoyne, S. and Sellinger, D.M., In: First International Conference on CANDU Fuel, Conference Proceedings, Chalk River, Ontario, 383 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Notley, M.J.F., Nucl. Technol. 44, 445 (1979).Google Scholar
15. Vasyvich, K.V., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10463 (C0G-91–340) (1993).Google Scholar
16. Floyd, M.R., Novak, J. and Truant, P.T.. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10636 (1992).Google Scholar
17. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H. and Tait, J.C., Grain-Boundary Inventories in Used CANDU Fuels, in preparation (1995).Google Scholar
18. Gray, V.J. and Strachan, D.M., Materials Research Society Proceedings 212, 205 (1991).Google Scholar
19. Gray, V.J., Strachan, D.M. and Wilson, C.N., Materials Research Society Proceedings 257, 353 (1992).Google Scholar