Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:16:41.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mean Field and Monte Carlo Modeling of Multiblock Copolymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

K. ø. Rasmussen ,
T. D. Sewell ,
T. Lookman  and
A. Saxena
K. ø. Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
T. D. Sewell
Affiliation:
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
T. Lookman
Affiliation:
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
A. Saxena
Affiliation:
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Get access

Extract

Abstract We compare for multiblock copolymers the results of mean field calculations with those from Monte Carlo simulations based on the bond uctuation method and experimental results from scattering data. The application of Leibler's [1] theory for copolymers and the results of Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the microphase separation transition occurs at larger xN as the number of blocks is increased beyond two (i.e., beyond diblock), and that the characteristic length scale of the emerging morphology decreases as the number of blocks increases. The latter is in qualitative agreement with published experimental results [2] for model multiblock poly(styrene-isoprene) systems and recent results [3] for a segmented poly(ester-urethane).

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 661: Symposium KK – Filled & Nanocomposite Polymer Materials , 2000 , KK4.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Leibler, L., Macromolecules 13, 1602 (1980).Google Scholar
[2] Smith, S. D., Spontak, R. J., Satkowski, M. M., Ashraf, A., Heape, A. K., and Lin, J. S., Polymer 35, 4527 (1994).Google Scholar
[3] Hjelm, R.et al., private communication.Google Scholar
[4] Gennes, P.-G. de, Scaling Concepts in Polymers Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1953), pp. 245.Google Scholar
[5] Kavassalis, T. A. and Whitmore, M. D., Macromolecules 24 5340 (1991).Google Scholar
[6] Ohta, T. and Kawasaki, K., Macromolecules 19, 2621 (1986).Google Scholar
[7] Doi, M. and Edwards, S. F., The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986), pp. 143.Google Scholar
[8] Ref. [4], pp. 71.Google Scholar
[9] Deutsch, H. P. and Binder, K., J. Chem. Phys. 94, 2294 (1991).Google Scholar
[10] Baschnagel, J. and Binder, K., Physica A 204 47 (1994).Google Scholar
[11] LASL Explosive Property Data, Gibbs, T. R. and Popolato, A., eds. (University of Cali-fornia Press, Berkeley, 1980), pp. 109–119; http://lib-www.lanl.gov/books/epro.pdf.Google Scholar
[12] Strobl, G., The Physics of Polymers (Springer, Berlin, 1997), pp. 129.Google Scholar
[13] Shi, A., Noolandi, A., and Desai, R. C., Macromolecules 29, 6487 (1996).Google Scholar
[14] See Chitanvis, S.' contribution in this volume.Google Scholar