Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:49:57.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Md Investigation of Thermal Spike Effects on Defect Production and Disordering by Displacement Cascades in Nl3AL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

F. Gao
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Engineering, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, U.K.
D. J. Bacon
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Engineering, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are used to obtain detailed information on defect production and disordering produced in the primary cascade state of radiation damage in Ni3AI as a function of irradiation temperature, Tirr Although the number of Frenkel pairs decreases with increasing Tirr, the size of interstitial clusters and the interstitial clustering fraction increase with Tirr. The number of antisites defects per cascade increases by about 20% as Tir increases from 100 to 600K, and then by about 90% from 600 to 900K due to the increase in the intensity and lifetime of the thermal spike. The average size of disordered zones at different Tir, is compared with experimental transmission electron microscopy data and the results are in reasonable agreement. The long-range order parameter in the cascade region is found to be consistent with values obtained experimentally on Ni3A1 irradiated by ions to a similar dose. The chemical short-range order parameter is about 0.6 over the whole range of Tirr, considered, suggesting that the cascade core retains some short-range order at high temperature due to local reordering.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jenkins, M. L., English, C. A. and Tichmarsch, J. M., Inst. Phys Conf. Ser., 41 (978) 375.Google Scholar
2. Jenkins, M. L., Mavani, P., S. Mueller and Abromeit, C., in these proceedings.Google Scholar
3. Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Caro, A., Spaczer, M., Janaway, G. A., Guinan, M. W. and Victoria, M., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. in Phys Res., 80–81 (1993) 86.Google Scholar
4. Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Caro, A. and Spaczer, M., Phys. Rev. B, 47(1993) 11483.Google Scholar
5. Gao, F. and Bacon, D. J., Phil. Mag. A, 71 (1995) 43.Google Scholar
6. Gao, F. and Bacon, D. J., Phil. Mag. A, 71 (1995) 65.Google Scholar
7. Gao, F. and Bacon, D. J., submitted to Phil Mag. A (1998).Google Scholar
8. Gao, F. and Bacon, D. J., Phil. Mag. A, 67 (1993) 275.Google Scholar
9. Vitek, V., Ackland, G. J. and Cserti, J., Mat. Res, Soc. Symp. Proc. 186 (1990) 227.Google Scholar
10. Gao, F., Bacon, D. J., Flewitt, P. E. J. and Lewis, T. A., J. Nucl. Mater., 249 (1997) 77.Google Scholar
11. Bui, T. X., Robertson, I. M. and Kirk, R. A., Mat. Res, Soc. Symp. Proc. 373 (1995) 63.Google Scholar
12. Mueller, S., PhD Thesis, Technical University Berlin (1997).Google Scholar
13. Kapinos, V. G. and Bacon, D. J., Phil. Mag. A, 72 (1995)1413.Google Scholar