Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:32:42.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Manufacturing Aluminum Sandwich Structures by Means of Superplastic Forming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. Impiö
Affiliation:
Leinovalu Oy, Finland
J. Pimenoff
Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Engineering Materials, P.O. Box 4200, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland
H. Hänninen
Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Engineering Materials, P.O. Box 4200, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland
M. Heinäkari
Affiliation:
Turku Polytechnic, Finland
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines the possibilities of manufacturing large-scale aluminium sandwich structures using superplastic forming. The materials tested were Mg-alloyed production quality aluminium (Al 5083-0, Al 5083-H321) and Aluminium 1561. Tensile tests at elevated temperatures were performed in order to establish the suitability of the test materials for superplastic forming. The microstructural changes in the test material specimens were examined. Thereafter numerical simulation of the Al 5083-0 forming process was conducted based on the tensile test results. The numerical simulation results were subsequently used to estimate forming parameters and the feasibility of manufacturing large-scale structures by superplastic forming.

The results indicate that higher strain can be reached at higher temperatures for the test materials. Aluminium alloy 1561 exhibited the largest elongation to fracture and Al 5083-H321 the smallest. Strain appeared to be temperature dependent but not much affected by the strain rate. Metallographic examination clarified that Al-5083-0 and AI-5083-H321 showed susceptibility for cavity forming whereas Aluminium 1561 formed relatively few voids. The numerical simulation indicated that Al 5083-0 can be superplastically formed using relatively low forming pressure (0.9 – 1.4 bar).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Impiö, P., MSc thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, 1998.Google Scholar
2. Vetrano, J.S., Levander, C.A., Hamilton, C.H., Smith, M.T. and Bruemmer, S.M, Scripta Met. 30, 565 (1994).10.1016/0956-716X(94)90430-8Google Scholar
3. Hsiao, I.C. and Huang, J.C., Scripta Mat. 40, 697 (1999).10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00460-6Google Scholar
4. Hojas, M.H. and Kühlein, W., in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Aluminium Alloys, Arnberg, L., Lohne, O., Nes, E., Ryum, N., Ed., Vol II, 1992, pp. 151156.Google Scholar
5. Hatch, J.E., Aluminium: Properties and Physical Metallurgy, (American Society for Metals, OH, 1984), p. 424.Google Scholar