Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:34:47.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetomechanical Properties of Circumferentially Field-Annealed Metglas® 2605SC Cylinders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

J. B. Restorff
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, 10901 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903
M. Wun-Fogle
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, 10901 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903
A. E. Clark
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, 10901 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903
Thu-Van T. Luu
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, 10901 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20903
Get access

Abstract

We have measured the magnetomechanical coupling coefficient of Metglas®2605SC (Fe81B13.5C2) ribbons that were annealed into 1.27 and 0.8 cm diameter cylinders. Lengths ranged from 0.6 to 5 cm. A novel furnace was constructed in which a cylindrical magnetic field was supplied by a current carrying copper rod. During the annealing, a 300 A current created a circumferential field of more than 6400 A/m. Annealing temperatures ranged from 380 to 420 ºC. Large shifts in both the optimum bias field and the coupling coefficient as a function of length and diameter were found due to demagnetizing effects. Impedance vs. frequency measurements show large numbers of modes, some of which are field dependent. Effective coupling coefficientsof the lowest order longitudinal mode were calculated from impedance measurements by using k2 = 1-f2r/f2a, where fr, and fa. are the resonant and antiresonant frequencies respectively. Coupling coefficients for 5 cm long cylinders were as high as 0.58. When the demagnetizing factor is taken into account, we find material coupling coefficients as high as 0.89.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Brouha, M. and Borst, J. van der, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 7594 (1979) and M. A. Mitchell, J. R. Cullen, R. Abbundi, A. Clark and H. Savage, J. Appl. Phys 50, 1627 (1979).Google Scholar
2Modzelewski, C., Savage, H. T., Kabacoff, L. T. and Clark, A. E., IEEE Trans. Magn. 17, 2837 (1981).Google Scholar
3Restorff, J. B., Wun-Fogle, M., Hathaway, K. B. and Clark, A. E., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 4668 (1991).Google Scholar
4Hristoforou, E. and Reilly, R. E., IEEE Trans. Magn. 27 5244 (1991).Google Scholar
5Bucholtz, F., Koo, K. P., Yurek, A. M., McVicker, J. M. and Dandridge, A., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3790 (1987).Google Scholar
6Hueter, Theodor F. and Bolt, Richard H., Sonics, (John Wiley & Sons, NewYork, 1955) pp. 146149.Google Scholar
7Fish, Gordan, Allied Corp., private communication; also agrees with values for ribbons measured here.Google Scholar
8Joseph, R. I. and Schlomann, E., J. Appl. Phys. 36, 1579 (1965).Google Scholar
9Clark, A. E. and Wun-Fogle, M., IEEE Trans. Magn. 25, 3611 (1989).Google Scholar