Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:32:30.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetization Reversal in NiFe Nano-triangles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Xinghua Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Sarjoosing Goolaup
Affiliation:
[email protected], Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Chunxiao Cong
Affiliation:
[email protected], Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
wensiang Lew
Affiliation:
[email protected], Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Get access

Abstract

We have fabricated sub-100 nm triangles NiFe triangle arrays using NSL and the MOKE measurement and micromagnetic simulations were carried out to investigate the reversal mechanism of the arrays. Enhancement of coercivity compared to the thin film was observed in all the three arrays but in different degree from the MOKE measurement. With the increase of the lateral size of the triangle, the effect of the coercivity enhancing decreases. Micromagnetic simulation shows that instead of domain wall nucleation and annihilation in the thin film, the reversal mechanism of the 45 and 80 nm triangles is dominated by the coherent rotation. While in the 100 nm triangle, the magnetic reversal takes place via forming and reversing a V like sate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vaz, C. A. F. Bland, J. A. C. and Lauhoff, G.Magnetism in ultrathin film structures,” Reports on Progress in Physics 71 (5) (2008).Google Scholar
2 Wachowiak, A. Wiebe, J. Pietzsch, O. et al. , “Direct Observation of Internal Spin Structure of Magnetic Vortex Cores,” science 298 (5593), 577 (2002).Google Scholar
3 Saitoh, Eiji, Miyajima, Hideki, Yamaoka, Takehiro et al. , “Current-induced resonance and mass determination of a single magnetic domain wall,” nature 432, 203205 (2004).Google Scholar
4 Shinjo, T. Okuno, T. Hassdorf, R. et al. , “Magnetic vortex core observation in circular dots of permalloy,” science 289 (5481), 930932 (2000).Google Scholar
5 Li, S. P. Peyrade, D. Natali, M. et al. , “Flux Closure Structures in Cobalt Rings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (6), 1102 (2001).Google Scholar
6 Cowburn, R. P. Koltsov, D. K. Adeyeye, A. O. et al. , “Single-domain circular nanomagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (5), 10421045 (1999).Google Scholar
7 Ross, C. A. Hwang, M. Shima, M. et al. , “Micromagnetic behavior of electrodeposited cylinder arrays,” Phys. Rev. B65 (14), 144417 (2002).Google Scholar
8 Niu, D. X. Zou, X. Wu, J. et al. , “Anisotropic magnetization reversal in 30 nm triangular FeNi dots,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (7), 072501072503 (2009).Google Scholar
9 Zhu, F. Q. Chern, G. W. Tchernyshyov, O. et al. , “Magnetic bistability and controllable reversal of asymmetric ferromagnetic nanorings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2) (2006).Google Scholar
10“Availabe at http://math.nist.gov/oommf.”Google Scholar