Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:47:18.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic Hardening of Mechanically Alloyed Pr2Co7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2012

L. Bessais
Affiliation:
CMTR, ICMPE, UMR7182, CNRS – UPEC, 2-8 rue Henri Dunant F-94320 Thiais, France,
R. Fersi
Affiliation:
CMTR, ICMPE, UMR7182, CNRS – UPEC, 2-8 rue Henri Dunant F-94320 Thiais, France, LMOP, Faculty of Science of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia,
M. Cabié
Affiliation:
CP2M, University Paul Cezanne, F-13397 Marseille, France
N. Mliki
Affiliation:
LMOP, Faculty of Science of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia,
Get access

Abstract

The Pr2Co7 alloys are known to crystallize in two polymorphic forms: a hexagonal of the Ce2Ni7 type structure and a rhombohedral of the Gd2Co7 one. They were synthesized by mechanical milling and subsequent annealing in high vacuum. In this work, we focus on the structural study of these phases using X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Also, we present the evolution of magnetic properties of these compounds vs the annealing temperature. The coercivity increases with annealing temperature reaching a maximum for TA = 800 °C. The highest is equal to 18 kOe at 293 K and 23 kOe at 10 K. The high magnetic properties observed in these nanostructured Pr2Co7 intermetallic alloys have their origin in its relatively high uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy field, and in the homogeneous nanostructure developed by mechanical milling process and subsequent annealing. This high coercivity is attributed to the high anisotropy field of the Pr2Co7 phase and its nanoscale grain size. This leads to the formation of a magnetically hard Pr2Co7 phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Deryagin, A. V., J.Phys. C5, 165 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Buschow, K. H. J., J. Less-Common. Met. 33, 311 (1973).10.1016/0022-5088(73)90050-7Google Scholar
3. Kirchmayr, H. R. and Poldy, C. A., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 8, 1 (1978).10.1016/0304-8853(78)90073-2Google Scholar
4. Bessais, L. and Djega-Mariadassou, C., Phys. Rev. B 63, 054 412 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.63.054412Google Scholar
5. Bessais, L., Sab, S., Djega-Mariadassou, C., and Greneche, J. M., Phys. Rev. B 66, 054 430 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevB.66.054430Google Scholar
6. Bessais, L., Djega-Mariadassou, C., Nandra, A., Appay, M. D., and Burzo, E., Phys. Rev. B 68, 024 406 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Buschow, K. H. J., Rep. Prog. Phys. 40, 1179 (1974).10.1088/0034-4885/40/10/002Google Scholar
8. Givord, D. and Lemaire, R., IEEE Trans. Magn. 10, 109 (1974).10.1109/TMAG.1974.1058311Google Scholar
9. Fischer, R. and Kronmuller, H., Phys. Rev. B 54, 7284 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.7284Google Scholar
10. Fischer, R. and Kronmuller, H., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 191, 225 (1999).10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00239-XGoogle Scholar