Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:23:32.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Temperature Cleaning of Ge and GaAs Surfaces Using Hydrogen Dissociated with a Remote Noble-Gas Discharge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

S. V Hatitangady
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709–2194.
R. A. Rudder
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709–2194.
M. J. Mantini
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709–2194.
G. G. Fountain
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709–2194.
J. B. Posthill
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709–2194.
R. J. Markunas
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709–2194.
Get access

Abstract

The native oxides of Ge and GaAs have long been known to preclude the formation of suitable MIS structures. In situ cleaning of Ge and GaAs surfaces has been achieved at 300–375 °C using a novel technique employing hydrogen that is dissociated using a remote Ar discharge. Such a technique circumvents the problems of cross contamination introduced from a directly excited hydrogen discharge due to erosion of the quartz tube walls by the active hydrogen. Reconstructed surfaces characteristic of clean Ge and GaAs surfaces have been observed with Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED) following such a treatment. Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) analyses show that such a treatment removes both oxygen and carbon contamination from the surface. XPS window scans on the Ga-3d and the As-3d peaks show that the treatment is successful in removing oxygen bonded to both Ga and As on the GaAs surface.

Following the in situ cleaning, excellent MIS structures on Ge and GaAs have been realized with a novel structure that utilizes an ultra-thin Si interlayer (1.5 nm) between the insulator-oxide and the clean semicondutor surface. The Si interlayer prevents any sub-cutaneous oxidation of the underlying semiconductor while exploiting the advantages of the excellent Si-SiO2 interface. The entire structure is fabricated in a single-chamber remote plasma CVD unit.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Grimaldi, M.G., Maenpaa, M., Paine, B.M., Lau, S.S., and Tseng, W F., J. Appl. Phys., 52(3), 1351,1981.Google Scholar
2. Palmstrom, C J. and Gavin, G.J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 47(8), 815, 1985.Google Scholar
3. Fountain, G.G., Rudder, R.A., Hattangady, S.V., Vitkavage, D.J., Markunas, R.J., and Posthill, J.B., Elec. Lett., 24(16), 1010, 1988.Google Scholar
4. Suzuki, N., Hariu, T., and Shibata, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., 33(8), 761, 1978.Google Scholar
5. Russell, G.J., Surf. Sci., 19, 217, 1970.Google Scholar
6. Ishizaka, A. and Shiraki, Y., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 666, 1986.Google Scholar
7. Comfort, J.H. and Reif, R., J. Electrochem. Soc., 136, 2399, 1989.Google Scholar
8. Laurence, G., Simondet, F, and Saget, P., Appl. Phys., 19, 63, 1979.Google Scholar
9. Chang, R.P.H. and Darack, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 38(11), 898,1981.Google Scholar
10. Saito, J., Nanbu, K., Ishikawa, T., and Kondo, K., Jap. J. Appl. Phys., 27(4), L702, 1988.Google Scholar
11. Sugata, S., Takamori, A., Takado, N., Asakawa, K., Miyauchi, E., and Hashimoto, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 6(4), 1087, 1988.Google Scholar
12. Hattangady, S.V., Rudder, R.A., Fountain, G.G., Vitkavage, D.J., and Markunas, R.J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 102, 319, 1988.Google Scholar
13. Rudder, R.A., Fountain, G.G., and Markunas, R.J., J. Appl. Phys., 60(10), 3519, 1986.Google Scholar
14. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, eds. Wagner, C.D., Riggs, W M., Davis, L.E., Moulder, J.E, and Mullenberg, G.E., Perkin Elmer Corporation, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (1979).Google Scholar
15. Hattangady, S.V, Fountain, G.G., Vitkavage, D.J., Rudder, R.A., and Markunas, R.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 136(7), 2070,1989.Google Scholar
16. Vitkavage, D.J., Fountain, G.G., Rudder, R.A., Hattangady, S.V., and Markunas, R.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53(8), 692, 1988.Google Scholar