Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:09:01.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low Energy Ion Beam Assisted Deposition of Low Resistivity Aluminum Using TMAA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

H. Q. Yan ,
H. Wang  and
A. J. Steckl
H. Q. Yan
Affiliation:
Nanoelectronics Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Cincinnati, OH 45221-0030
H. Wang
Affiliation:
Nanoelectronics Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Cincinnati, OH 45221-0030
A. J. Steckl
Affiliation:
Nanoelectronics Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Cincinnati, OH 45221-0030
Get access

Abstract

Thermal deposition and Ga+ ion beam assisted deposition of Al using TMAA have been studied. At temperatures between 95ºC and 105ºC, where thermal deposition is negligible, the introduction of a low energy Ga+ ion beam (8 to 10 keV) produces selective deposition. Ion beam seeding followed by ion beam irradiation during TMAA flow leads to consistent selectivity at this temperature range. The lowest resistivity of selectively deposited Al film is 7 µΩ-cm, only 2.5 times the bulk Al resistivity. The selective deposition rate is about 300Å/min. Depositions at higher temperature produced very low resistivity Al films, but with a decreasing selectivity ratio. X-ray diffraction showed that deposited Al films are polycrystalline, with very small FWHM.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 316: Symposium A – Materials Synthesis and Processing Using Ion Beams , 1993 , 863
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Blauner, P. G., Butt, Y., Ro, J.S., Thomson, C. V. and Melngailis, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B7, 1816, (1989).Google Scholar
2 Delia Ratta, A. D., Melngailis, J., Thompson, C.V. and J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Nov/Dec, (1993)Google Scholar
3 Gamo, K., Takakura, N., Samoto, N., Shimizu, R. and Namba, S., J. J. Appl. Phys., 23, L293, (1984).Google Scholar
4 Kubena, R.L. and Stratton, F.P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B6, 1865, (1988).Google Scholar
5 Gross, M.E., Harriot, L.R. and Jr.Opila, R.L., Journal of Appl. Phys., 68, 4820, (1990).Google Scholar
6 Baum, T. H., Larson, C. E. and Jackson, R.L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 55, 1264, (1989).Google Scholar
7 Jordan, A.S., Abernathy, C.R., Pearton, S.J. and Robertson, A., Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, report number WL–TR–91–4029, (1991).Google Scholar
8 Pitts, B.L., Emerson, D.T. and Shealy, J.R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 62, 1821, (1993).Google Scholar
9 Fujii, K., Suemune, I. and Yamanishi, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 62, 1420, (1993).Google Scholar
10 Lee, K-I, Kim, Y-S and Joo, S-K, J. Electrochem. Soc, 139, 3578, (1993).Google Scholar