Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:45:10.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-Distance Obsidian Trade in Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Robert H. Tykot  and
Stephen Chia
Robert H. Tykot
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, U. of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, [email protected]
Stephen Chia
Affiliation:
Pusat Penyelidikan Arkeologi Malaysia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
Get access

Abstract

Long-distance trade in obsidian from sources in the southwest Pacific has been well-documented for the Lapita culture complex, beginning about 1600 BC. Analyses of obsidian artifacts from recent excavations at Bukit Tengkorak in southeastern Sabah (Borneo, Malaysia) indicate the use of obsidian from multiple sources in Melanesia as early as the 5th millennium BC. The archaeological presence of obsidian, up to more than 3500 km from its source, is the surviving evidence of what was almost certainly the longest Neolithic trade route in the world. In addition, these results indicate that long-distance trade networks existed in Indonesia at least 2500 years prior to the Lapita culture, and strengthen hypotheses of its origins in southeast Asia.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 462: Symposium DD – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology V , 1996 , 175
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Skinner, C.E. and Tremaine, K.J., Obsidian: An Interdisciplinary Bibliography (International Association for obsidian Studies Occasional paper 1, 1993).Google Scholar
2. http://www.peak.org/obsidian/obsidian.html.Google Scholar
3. Bird, J.R., Russell, L.H., Scott, M.D. and Ambrose, W.R., Analytical Chemistry 50, 2082–84 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Duerden, P., Bird, J.R., Scott, M.D., Clayton, E., Russell, L.H. and Cohen, D.D., Nuclear Instruments and Methods 168, 447–452 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Bird, J.R., Ambrose, W.R., Russell, L.H. and Scott, M.D., The Characterisation of Melanesian Obsidian Sources and Artefacts Using the Proton-induced Gamma-Ray Emission (PIGME) Technique (Report No. E/510, Australian Atomic Energy Commission, Lucas Heights, 1981).Google Scholar
6. Bird, J.R., Duerden, P., Ambrose, W.R. and Leach, B.F., in Archaeological Studies of Pacific Stone Resources, edited by Leach, B.F. and Davidson, J. (British Archaeological Reports 104, Oxford, 1981), pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
7. Duerden, P., Clayton, E., Bird, J.R., Ambrose, W. and Leach, F., in Archaeometry: Further Australasian Studies, edited by Ambrose, W.R. and Mummery, J.M.J. (Australian National University/Australian National Gallery, Canberra, 1987), pp. 250–260.Google Scholar
8. Bird, J.R. and Shahgholi, N., in 7th Australian Conference on Nuclear Techniques of Analysis (Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1991), pp. 110–113.Google Scholar
9. Bird, J.R., in La Pierre Préhistorique, edited by Menu, M. and Walter, P. (Laboratoire de Recherche des Musées de France, 1992), pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
10. Summerhayes, G.R., Bird, J.R., Hotchkiss, M., Gosden, C., Specht, J., Torrence, R. and Fullagar, R., in 8th Australian Conference on Nuclear Techniques of Analysis (Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1993), pp. 107–109.Google Scholar
11. Bird, J.R., Torrence, R., Bailey, G.M. and Summerhayes, G., in 5th Australasian Conference on Archaeometry (University of New England, Annidale, NSW, forthcoming).Google Scholar
12. Summerhayes, G., Bird, J.R., Fullagar, R., Gosden, C., Specht, J. and Torrence, R., in Archaeological Obsidian Studies. Method and Theory, edited by Shackley, M.S. (Plenum, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
13. Irwin, G., The Prehistoric Exploration and Colonisation of the Pacific (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
14. Best, S.. Archaeology in Oceania 22. 21–32 (1987).Google Scholar
15. Bandi, H.-G., in Suseestudien. Gedenkschrift zur Erinnerung an Felix Speiser, edited by Gandi, H.-G. et al. (Museum fur Volkerkunde und Schweizerischen, Basel, 1951), pp. 127–161.Google Scholar
16. Subagas, N.A., Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia 5, 35–41 (1979).Google Scholar
17. van Heekeran, H.R., The Stone Age of Indonesia (Nijhoff, The Hague, 2nd edition, 1972).Google Scholar
18. Beyer, H.O., Bulletin No. 29. National Research Council of the Philippines (Quezon City, 1948).Google Scholar
19. Fox, R.B., The Tabon Caves (National Museum Monograph 1, Manila, 1970).Google Scholar
20. Bellwood, P. and Koon, P., Antiquity 63, 613–622 (1989).Google Scholar
21. Bellwood, P.. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 9, 122–161 (1989).Google Scholar
22. Bird, J.R.. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 9, 161–162 (1989).Google Scholar
23. Bellwood, P., Asian Perspectives 19, 240–288 (1976).Google Scholar
24. Bellwood, P., Journal of World Prehistory 1, 171–224 (1987).Google Scholar
25. Bellwood, P.. Borneo Research Bulletin 24, 7–16 (1976).Google Scholar
26. Tykot, R.H., Journal of Archaeological Science 24 (1997).Google Scholar
27. Bird, J.R., Pacific Obsidian Studies (Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, forthcoming).Google Scholar