Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:16:51.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Length Scale Effect on Deformation and Failure Mechanisms of Ultra-Fine Grained Aluminum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Khalid Hattar
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois, Materials Science, 1304 W. Green St., Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States, 217-244-6852
J H Han
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, United States
D M Follstaedt
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, United States
S J Hearne
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sandia National Laboratories, United States
T A Saif
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, United States
I M Robertson
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois, Materials Scinece and Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

The deformation and failure processes in ultra-fine and nanograined metals over different length scales have been probed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in combination with a micromechanical in situ straining device. This novel straining device affords the opportunity to directly correlate the macroscopic mechanical properties with the microscopic deformation and failure mechanisms. Through use of this device it has been shown that increased film thickness results in a transition between limited plasticity and intergranular fracture to global plasticity and shear failure for deposited aluminum samples of similar grain size but different thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Conrad, H. and Jung, K., Scripta Materialia, 53 (5), 581 (2005).Google Scholar
2 Schwaiger, R., et al. , Acta Materialia, 51 (17), 5159 (2003).Google Scholar
3 Wei, Q., et al. , Materials Science and Engineering A, 381 (1-2), 71 (2004).Google Scholar
4 Jia, D., Ramesh, K.T., and Ma, E., Acta Materialia, 51 (12), 3495 (2003).Google Scholar
5 Torre, F.D., Swygenhoven, H.V., and Victoria, M., Acta Materialia, 50 39573970 (2002).Google Scholar
6 Cheng, S., et al. , Acta Materialia, 53 (5), 1521 (2005).Google Scholar
7 Schiøtz, J. and Jacobsen, K.W., Science, 301 13571359 (2003).Google Scholar
8 Van Swygenhoven, H., et al. , edited by 634, Materials Research Society, 2001) pp. 5.Google Scholar
9 Wolf, D., et al. , Acta Materialia, 53 (1), 1 (2005).Google Scholar
10 Yamakov, V., et al. , Nature Materials, 3 4347 (2004).Google Scholar
11 Wang, Y.M., Hamza, A.V., and Ma, E., Applied Physics Letters, 86 (24), 241917 (2005).Google Scholar
12 Hugo, R.C., et al. , Acta Materialia, 51 19371943 (2003).Google Scholar
13 Kumar, K.S., et al. , Acta Materialia, 51 387405 (2003).Google Scholar
14 Mitra, R., Chiou, W.-A., and Weertman, J.R., Journal of Materials Research, 19 10291037 (2004).Google Scholar
15 Shan, Z., et al. , Science, 305 (5684), 654 (2004).Google Scholar
16 Shan, Z. and Mao, S.X., Advanced Engineering Materials, 7 (7), 603 (2005).Google Scholar
17 Hattar, K., et al. , Journal of Materials Research, 20 18691877 (2005).Google Scholar
18 Hattar, K., et al. , edited by (Microscopy and Microanlysis Society. 2004) pp.Google Scholar
19 Van Swygenhoven, H. and Caro, A., edited by 457, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1997) pp. 193.Google Scholar
20 Haslam, A.J., et al. , Acta Materialia, 51 (7), 2097 (2003).Google Scholar