Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:36:19.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leaching of Whole, Defected Used Candu™ Fuel Elements in Saline Solutions Under Argon Pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

S. Stroes-Gascoyne
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE ILO
L. H. Johnson
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE ILO
J. C. Tait
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE ILO
D. M. Sellinger
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE ILO
Get access

Abstract

In the context of the Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Program, experiments were performed in which whole, intentionally defected used CANDU™ fuel elements were exposed to deoxygenated saline solutions at 100°C for 484 days. Results suggest that both 90Sr and 99Tc are preferentially released from grain boundaries and that 85Kr release is a good measure of the extent of grain-boundary dissolution. Severe grain-boundary attack in particular areas of the fuel is also evident from scanning electron microscope observations. It is hypothesized that such localized attack is related to fuel porosity. Because of its poor corrosion performance in saline solutions, the Zircaloy sheath cannot be considered as a radionuclide release barrier.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H., Beeley, P.A. and Sellinger, D.M. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Werme, L.O., (Proc. MRS, Pittsburgh, PA 1986) p. 317 Google Scholar
2. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H. and Sellinger, D.M., Nucl. Tech. 77, 320 (1987)Google Scholar
3. Johnson, L.H. and Shoesmith, D.W. in Radioactive Waste Forms of the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R., (New Holland) in press.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, L.H., Shoesmith, D.W. and Stroes-Gascoyne, S. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M. and Westerman, R.E., (Proc. MRS, Pittsburgh, PA 1988) p. 99 Google Scholar
5. Johnson, L.H., Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Chen, J.D., Attas, M.E., Sellinger, D.M. and Delaney, H.G. in Proc. Topical Meeting on Fission Product Behaviour and Source Term Research, Snowbird, Utah, 1984.Google Scholar
6. Abry, D.R.M., Abry, R.G.F., Ticknor, K.V. and Vandergraaf, T.T., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record TR-189 (1982)Google Scholar
7. Stroes-Gascoyne, S. and Sellinger, D.M. in Proc. International Conference on CANDU Fuel, Chalk River, Ont. 1986, edited by Hastings, I.J., p. 383.Google Scholar
8. Notley, M.J.F., Nucl. Technol. 44, 445 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Himmelblau, D.M., J. Chem. and Eng. Data 5, 10 (1960)Google Scholar
10. Werme, L.O. and Forsythe, R.S. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M. and Westerman, R.E., (Proc. MRS, Pittsburgh, PA 1988) p. 443 Google Scholar
11. Allard, B. and Torstenfeit, B. in KBS Technical Reports TR-83-60 (1983) SKF, StockholmGoogle Scholar
12. Hastings, I.J. in Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report AECL-Misc-249 (1982).Google Scholar