Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:21:48.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laser Thin Film Processing of Biopolymers: Mussel Adhesive Protein Analog

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Anand Doraiswamy ,
R J Narayan ,
C Z Dinu ,
R Cristescu ,
P B Messersmith ,
S Stafslien  and
D B Chrisey
Anand Doraiswamy
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of North Carolina, Biomedical Engineering, 152 McNaider Hall, campus box 7575, Chapel hill, NC, 27599, United States, 4045797682
R J Narayan
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of North Carolina, Biomedical Engineering, United States
C Z Dinu
Affiliation:
[email protected], Max Plank Institute, Germany
R Cristescu
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Institute for Lasers, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Romania
P B Messersmith
Affiliation:
[email protected], Northwestern University, Biomedical Engineering, United States
S Stafslien
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Dakota State University, Center for Nanoscale Science & Engineering, United States
D B Chrisey
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Dakota State University, Center for Nanoscale Science & Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

Mussel adhesive protein analogs are biologically-derived materials that possess unique adhesion properties. We have demonstrated thin film growth of DOPA modified- PEG block copolymer mussel adhesive protein analogs using a novel laser processing technique known as matrix assisted pulsed laser evaporation (MAPLE). The main functional groups of the mussel adhesive protein analog are present in the MAPLE-transferred film. These novel polymer thin films have numerous medical, electronic, and marine applications.

Keywords

biomimetic (assembly)laser ablationadhesive
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 897: Symposium J – Biomemetic Polymers and Gels , 2005 , 0897-J06-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hauptmann, M., Lubin, J.H., Stewart, P.A., Hayes, R.B. and Blair, A., Am. J. Epidemiol. 159, 1117–1130 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Coggon, D., Harris, E.C., Poole, J. and Palmer, K.T., J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 95, 1608–1614 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Waite, J. H., Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B, 97 (1990) 19.Google Scholar
4. Yu, M., Deming, T. J., Macromol., 31 (1998) 4739.Google Scholar
5. Sierra, D., Saltz, R., (Eds.), Surgical Adhesives and Sealants: Current Technology and Applications, RC Press, Tucson, AZ, 1998.Google Scholar
6. Yu, M. and Deming, T.J., Macromolecules 31, 4739–4745 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Huang, K., Lee, B.P., Ingram, D.R. and Messersmith, P.B., Biomacromolecules 3, 397–406 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Chrisey, D.B., Pique, A., McGill, R.A., Horwitz, J.S., Ringeisen, B.R., Bubb, D.M. and Wu, P.K, Chem. Rev. 103, 553–576 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Dalsin, J. L., Lin, L., Tosatti, S., Voros, J., Textor, M. and Messersmith, P., Langmiur, 21, 640–646, 2005.Google Scholar