Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:10:51.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ir Radiation Transient Annealing of Silicon Implanted Si Gallium Arsenide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

A. Ezis ,
Y. K. Yeo  and
Y. S. Park
A. Ezis
Affiliation:
Universal Energy Systems, Inc., 4401 Dayton-Xenia Road, Dayton, Ohio 45432;
Y. K. Yeo
Affiliation:
Universal Energy Systems, Inc., 4401 Dayton-Xenia Road, Dayton, Ohio 45432;
Y. S. Park
Affiliation:
Afwal/Aadr, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433.
Get access

Abstract

The electrical properties of IR radiation transient annealed Si implanted semi-insulating GaAs are presented for 100 keV ion doses from 3 × 1012 to 3 × 1014 cm−2. For wafers implanted with 3 × 1012 cm−2 doses, suitable for FET channel layers, carrier concentration and drift mobility profiles were determined from C-V and transconductance measurements on fat FET structures. Optimum electrical activation and carrier concentration profiles were obtained for peak pulse temperatures of 930–950°C. Van der Pauw measurements were made on substrates implanted with Si doses ≥ 1 × 1013 cm−2 to determine sheet carrier concentration and Hall mobility. The peak pulse temperature required to give optimum activation efficiency is found to increase with dose. The results presented here demonstrate that undoped substrates are preferable to Cr-doped substrates for low dose device applications.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 23 , 1983 , 681
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Kohzu, H., Kuzuhara, M., and Takayama, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 4998–5003 (1983).Google Scholar
2.Kuzuhara, M., Kohzu, H., and Takayama, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 755–758 (1982).Google Scholar
3.Arai, M, Nishiyama, K., and Watanabe, N., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 20, L124–L126 (1981).Google Scholar
4.Tabatabaie-Alevi, K., Masum Choudhury, A. N. M., Fonstad, C. G., and Gelpey, J. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 505–507 (1983).Google Scholar
5.Davies, D. E., McNally, P. J., Lorenzo, J. P., and Julian, M., IEEE Electron Device Letts. EDL–3, 102–103 (1982).Google Scholar
6.Pucel, R. A., and Krumm, C. F., Electronics Letts. 12, 240–242 (1976).Google Scholar
7.Gibbons, J. F., Johnson, W. S., and Mylroie, S. W., Projected Range Statistics - Semiconductors and Related Materials, 2nd edition (Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc. (1975)Google Scholar