Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:18:17.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ion Implantation Damage in Silicate Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

George W. Arnold*
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87185, USA
*
* This work performed at Sandia National Laboratories supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contact under number DE-AC04-76DP00789.
Get access

Abstract

Ion implantation is a rapid technique for simulating damage induced by α-recoil nuclei in nuclear waste forms. The simulation has been found to be quite good in TEM comparisons with natural α-decay damage in minerals, but leach rate differences have been observed in glass studies and were attributed to dose-rate differences. The similarities between ion implantation and recoil nuclei as a means of producing damage suggest that insights into the long-term behavior of glass waste forms can be obtained by examination of what is known about ion-implantation damage in silicate glasses. This paper briefly reviews these effects and shows that leaching results in certain nuclear waste glasses can be understood as resulting from plastic flow and track overlap. Phase separation is also seen to be a possible consequence of damage-induced compositional changes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Headley, T. J., Arnold, G. W., and Northrup, C. J. M., Proc.of the 5th Int. Symposium on the Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, June 7–10, 1982, Berlin, W. Germany (to be published).Google Scholar
2. Northrup, C. J. M., Arnold, G. W., and Headley, T. J., Proc. of the 4th Int. Symposium on the Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Materials Research Society Symposium, Nov. 15–20, 1981, Boston, MA (to be published).Google Scholar
3. Burns, W. G., Hughes, A. E., Marples, J. A. C., Nelson, R. S., and Stoneham, A. M., Nature 295, 130 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dran, J. C., Maurette, M., and Petit, J. C., Science 209, 1518 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Arnold, G. W., Northrup, C. J. M., And Bibler, N. E., Proc. of the 5th Int. Symposium on the Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, June 7–10, 1982, Berlin, W. Germany (to be published).Google Scholar
6. Primak, W., Nuc. Sci. and Eng. 80, 689 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Arnold, G. W., Rad. Eff. (to be published).Google Scholar
8. EerNisse, E. P., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 167 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Brice, D. K., Rad. Eff. 6, 77 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Krefft, G. B. (unpublished data).Google Scholar
11. Webb, A. P., Houghton, A. J., and Townsend, P. D., Rad. Eff. 30, 177 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Arnold, G. W. and Borders, J. A., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 1488 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Borders, J. A. and Arnold, G. W., Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Ion Beam Surface Layer Analysis, Sept. 15-19, 1975, Karlsrffhe, Germany.Google Scholar
14. Arnold, G. W. and Peercy, P. S., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 41, 359 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar