Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:27:24.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigating the Interfacial Interactions Between Organic and Inorganic Phases and Their Influence on the Mechanics of Organic Phase in Natural Bone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Rahul Bhowmik
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Dakota State University, Civil Engineering, Fargo, ND, 58105, United States
Kalpana S Katti
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Dakota State University, Civil Engineering, Fargo, ND, 58105, United States
Dinesh R Katti
Affiliation:
[email protected], North Dakota State University, Civil Engineering, Fargo, ND, 58105, United States
Get access

Abstract

Bone is a highly ordered nanocomposite system consisting primarily of organic (collagen) and inorganic (hydroxyapatite(HAP)) phases. The nanocrystals of hydroxyapatite (HAP) mineralize at specific locations in bone. The collagen molecule in bone has C and N terminals which are known as C and N telopeptides. We have performed Molecular Dynamics (MD) and Steered MD (SMD) simulations to study the interface between HAP (mineral) and collagen with N-terminal telopeptides. The force field parameters for HAP were taken from our previous study and the force field parameters for collagen with telopeptides were taken from CHARMm force field. We have investigated the detailed conformation of telopeptides interacting with specific surfaces of mineral and the interface between HAP and collagen. The load-deformation behavior of collagen is obtained with SMD simulations. It has been found that the load deformation behavior of collagen is different when in close proximity of and interacting with HAP.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Murugan, R. and Ramakrishna, S., Comp. Sc. & Tech. 65. 2385 (2005).Google Scholar
2. Weiner, S. and Wagner, H.D., Annual Rev. Mater. Sc. 28, 271 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Malone, J.P., George, A., and Veis, A., PROTEINS: Strc. Func. & Bio. 54, 206 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Sikdar, D., Katti, D., Katti, K., Bhowmik, R., Polymer 47, 5196 (2006).Google Scholar
5. Bhowmik, R., Katti, K., and Katti, D., Polymer (in press).Google Scholar
6. Kale, L., Skeel, R., Bhandarkar, M., Brunner, R., Gursoy, A., Krawetz, N., Phillips, J., Shinozaki, A., Varadarajan, K., Schulten, K.J., Comput. Phys. 151, 283 (1999). http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/.Google Scholar