Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:53:23.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpreting Drop-Weight Impact Results in Terms of Deformation Dependent Initiation Criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

P. J. Baker  and
A. M. Mellor
P. J. Baker
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nashville, TN 37235
A. M. Mellor
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nashville, TN 37235
Get access

Abstract

The impact sensitivity of energetic materials is frequently measured in small-scale drop-weight tests. Plastic deformation of the sample leads to heating, the onset of chemical reaction, and eventual ignition. An analytic model provides deformation dependent estimates of the energy delivered to the sample, its stress state, and its temperature distribution. Results for hydoxy-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB/AP) propellants are interpreted in terms of two initiation criteria: critical decomposition temperature and critical thickness for shear banding. The influence of friction, impact velocity, and sample size on initiation give possible explanations of experimental results. Sample material properties variations are studied for both initiation criteria. The model includes energy localization by varying the thickness of shear layers at the sample/machine interface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 296: Symposium Y – Structure and Properties of Energetic Materials , 1992 , 107
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Coffey, C.S., DeVost, V.F. and Yergey, B.A., JANNAF Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting Proceedings (CPIA Publ. 446, I, 1986).Google Scholar
2. Baker, P.J., Mellor, A.M. and Coffey, C.S., J. Propuls. Power. 8, 578 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Coffey, C.S., DeVost, V.F. and Woody, D.L., JANNAF Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting Proceedings (CPIA Publ. 477, I, 1988).Google Scholar
4. Afanas'ev, G.T. and Bobolev, V.K., Initiation of Solid Explosives by Impact, (Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1971).Google Scholar
5. Baker, P.J. and Mellor, A.M., AIAA Paper 92–3631, 1992.Google Scholar
6. Avitzur, B., Metal Forming: Processes and Analysis, (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1968).Google Scholar
7. Avitzur, B. and Kohser, R.A., J. Eng. Ind. 100, 421 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Coffey, C.S., Frankel, M.J., Liddiard, T.P. and Jacobs, S.J., Seventh Symposium (International) on Detonation, (NSWC MP 82–334, 1981) pp. 970–975.Google Scholar
9. Jacobs, P.W.M. and Whitehead, H.M., Chem. Rev. 69, 551 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Winter, R.E. and Field, J.E., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 343, 399 (1975).Google Scholar
11. Mohan, V.K., Bhasu, Jyothi, , V.C. and Field, J.E., Ninth Symposium (International) on Detonation, (II, OCNR 113291∝7, 1989) pp. 1276–1283.Google Scholar
12. Staker, M.R., Acta Met. 29, 683 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar