Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:43:34.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interface Degradation in CAS/Nicalon During Elevated Temperature Aging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Kevin P. Plucknett
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6068
Rebecca L. Cain
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Materials Technology, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, U.K.
M.H. Lewis
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Materials Technology, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

A CaO-Al203-SiO2 (CAS)/Nicalon glass-ceramic matrix composite has been subjected to elevated temperature oxidation heat-treatments between 375 and 1200°C, for up to 100 hours. Micro- and macro-mechanical properties have been determined by fiber push-down, using a mechanical properties microprobe, and flexure testing, respectively. Aging between 450 and 800°C results in significant property degradation, with reduced bending modulus and flexure strength, increased fiber sliding stress, and a transition to a purely brittle failure mode. Aging degradation is due to oxidative removal of the carbon interlayer, with the subsequent formation of a silica bond between fiber and matrix. At higher temperatures, carbon is retained due to the formation of a protective silica plug at exposed fiber ends, with the subsequent retention of composite properties. Short duration pre-treatment schedules, at 1000 or 1100°C, were developed to prevent intermediate temperature property degradation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Evans, A.G. and Marshall, D.B., Acta Metall., 37 2567–83 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Evans, A.G., Zok, F.W. and Davis, J., Comp. Sci. Tech., 42 324 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Chaim, R. and Heuer, A.H., Adv. Ceram. Mat., 2 154–58 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Cooper, R.F. and Chyung, K., J. Mat. Sci., 22 3148–60 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Brennan, J.J., pp. 222–59 in Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Composites, Ed. Mazdiyasni, K.S., Noyes Publications, N.J., 1990.Google Scholar
6. Prewo, K.M., pp. 336–68 in Glasses and Glass-ceramics, Ed. Lewis, M.H., Chapman and Hall, London, 1989.Google Scholar
7. Lamicq, P., Bernhart, G., Dauchier, M. and Mace, J.G., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 65 336–38 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Sun, E.Y., Nutt, S.R. and Brennan, J.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77 1329–39 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Plucknett, K.P., Sutherland, S., Daniel, A.M., Cain, R.L., West, G., Taplin, D.M.R. and Lewis, M.H., accepted for publication in J. Micros., 1995.Google Scholar
10. Thouless, M.D., Sbaizero, O., Sigl, L.S. and Evans, A.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 72 525–32 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Pharaoh, M.W., Daniel, A.M. and Lewis, M.H., J. Mat. Sci. Lett., 12 9981001 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Vine, W.J. and Steeds, J.W., J. Micros., 169 207213 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Plucknett, K.P. and Lewis, M.H., submitted to J. Mat. Sci. Lett., 1994.Google Scholar