Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:34:24.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integration Studies of Plasma Deposited Fluorinated Amorphous Carbon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Thomas W. Mountsier
Affiliation:
Novellus Systems, Inc., 3970 N. First Street, MIS 252, San Jose, CA 95134
John A. Samuels
Affiliation:
Novellus Systems, Inc., 3970 N. First Street, MIS 252, San Jose, CA 95134
Richard S. Swope
Affiliation:
Novellus Systems, Inc., 3970 N. First Street, MIS 252, San Jose, CA 95134
Get access

Abstract

Recently, we reported the deposition of fluorinated amorphous carbon (FlAC) from hexafluorobenzene (C6F6) under parallel plate (PP) and inductively coupled plasma (ICP-HDP) conditions. Based on initial materials testing, these two platforms generated comparable materials with low dielectric constants (2.4 – 2.8), low weight loss/shrinkage (< 1.5 %/hr. at 425° C), hardness (2–3 Gpa) and adhesion (4–9 kpsi). Here we attempt to answer a basic integration question: FIAC compatibility with other materials used in the interconnect scheme. Investigations of adhesion of F1AC to, and capped by, silicon oxide, silicon nitride and various metals shows generally greater stability of the ICP generated material vs. PP-FIAC. Failures appeared to occur primarily at the FIAC/film interface at 400 and 300 °C for ICP and PP respectively. Although thickness-loss and weight-loss measurements indicate good thermal stability, TDS spectra show low-level outgassing of fluorine-based molecules and fragments even in samples annealed for 4 hours at 400 °C, resulting in interface failures. Plasma treatments and anneals of the F1AC were found to have a minimal effect but liner/cap composition and processing has a strong influence on the adhesion of other films to the fluorocarbon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mountsier, T. W. and Kumar, D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol.443, p. 41 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Endo, K., Tatsumi, T., Matsubara, Y., Iguchi, M., and Horiuchi, T., Proceedings of the 14th International VMIC, p. 547 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Robles, S., Xu, P., Yau, W-F., Huang, J., and Fairbairn, K, Conference Proceedings ULSI XIII, p. 373, Mat. Res. Soc. (1998).Google Scholar
4. Takeishi, S., Kudo, H., Shinohara, R., Hoshino, M., Fukuyama, S., Yamaguchi, J., and Yamada, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.144, No. 5, p. 1797 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Lakshminaryanan, S., Steigerwald, J., Price, D., Bourgeois, M., Chow, T. P., Gutmann, R. J., and Muraurka, S. P., Proceedings of the 11th International VMIC, p. 49 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Mountsier, T., Proceedings of the 4th International DUMIC, p. 109 (1998).Google Scholar
7. van de Ven, E., Connick, I., and Harrus, A. S., Proceedings of the 7th International IEEE VMIC, p. 194, IEEE (1990).Google Scholar
8. van den Hoek, W. G. M., Bondur, J., van Schravendijk, B., Roberts, C., and Cunningham, C., Proceedings of the 2 d International DUMIC, p. 103 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Endo, K., MRS Bulletin, Vol.22, No. 10, p. 55 (1997).Google Scholar