Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:49:11.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instability Analysis of Strained Interfaces Via a Discrete Atom Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Jong K. Lee*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931
Get access

Abstract

The morphological instability of an epitaxially-strained, thin film is studied by means of a discrete atom method in a dislocation-free, two-dimensional crystal. The instability of the film-substrate interface is also examined in conjunction with the migration of the free surface. The results show that a mobile film-substrate interface can accelerate merger between the two surfaces, and anisotropic effects facilitate island formation. In addition, the instability of a curved interface is discussed with the results on the morphological evolution of coherent precipitates. A circular, soft precipitate in an isotropic matrix undergoes a series of shape transitions before reaching its equilibrium shape. As in the strained thin film case, transition begins with interfacial waves induced by the coherency strain. The waves then develop small lobes, which coarsen into a lower density of larger lobes. The larger lobes eventually coarsen as the equilibrium shape is approached. Anisotropic effects suppress some of the interfacial waves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Eshelby, J. D., Prog. Solid Mech. 2, 89 (1961).Google Scholar
2. Khachaturyan, A. G., Theory of Structural Transformations in Solids, (Wiley, New York, 1983), p. 213.Google Scholar
3. Mura, T., Micromechanics of Defects in Solids, (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1987), p. 177.Google Scholar
4. Lee, J. K., Barnett, D. M., and Aaronson, H. I., Metall. Trans. 8A, 963 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Thompson, M. E., Su, C. S. and Voorhees, P. W., Acta Metal. 42, 2107 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Yang, Y., Chen, L. Q. and Khachaturyan, A. G., Scripta Metall. 25, 1387 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Satoh, S. and Johnson, W. C., Metall. Trans. 23A, 2761 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Gayda, J. and Srolovitz, D. J., Acta Metall. 37, 641 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Johnson, W. C., Earmme, Y. Y., and Lee, J. K., J. Appl. Mech. 47, 775 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Moschovidis, Z. A. and Mura, T., J. Appl. Mech. 42, 847 (1975).Google Scholar
11. Lee, J. K., Scripta Metall. 32, No. 4 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Hoover, W. G., Ashurst, W.T., and Olness, R. J., J. Chem. Phys. 60, 4043 (1974).Google Scholar
13. Binder, K., Monte Carlo Methods. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979), p. 1.Google Scholar
14. Lee, J. K., unpublished research (1994).Google Scholar
15. Srolovitz, D. J., Acta Metall. 37, 621 (1989).Google Scholar
16. Yeom, S. J., Yoon, D. Y., and Henry, M. F., Metall. Trans. 24A, 1975 (1993).Google Scholar
17. Meshkinpour, M. and Ardell, A. J., Mater. Sci. Eng. A185, 153 (1994).Google Scholar
18. Murr, L. E., Interfacial Phenomena in Metals and Alloys. (Addison, Reading, 1975), p. 31.Google Scholar
19. Gao, H., Modern Theory of Anisotropic Elasticity and Applications, edited by Wu, J. J., Ting, T. C. T. and Barnett, D. M. (Siam, Philadelphia, 1990), p. 139.Google Scholar
20. Gao, H., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 39, 443 (1991).Google Scholar
21. Spencer, B. J., Voorhees, P. W., and Davis, S. H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3696 (1991).Google Scholar
22. Freund, L B. and Jonsdottir, F., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 41, 1245 (1993).Google Scholar
23. Yang, W. H. and Srolovitz, D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1593 (1993).Google Scholar
24. Spencer, B. J. and Meiron, D. I., Acta Metall. 42, 3629 (1994).Google Scholar