Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:19:13.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-Situ Studies of the Formation of GA and AL Wires on SI(112) Facet Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S.M. Prokes
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5347
O.J. Glembocki
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5347
Get access

Abstract

Reflectance difference anisotropy (RDA) and low energy electron diffraction (LEED)have been used to study the formation of Ga or Al chains and nanowires on the Si(112) surface. At T > 350°C, the Ga or Al chains form at the step edges by a self-limiting process, while at lower temperatures, Ga or Al nanowires form on the terraces in addition to the chains on the ledges. The process has been tracked in real time from the rapid change of the (2×1) Si(112) reconstruction under subcritical coverage to chain formation leading to a 5×1 reconstruction followed by a 6×1 reconstruction’. During sequential deposition of Ga and Al, we observe (in RDA and AES) that Ga atoms forming the chains can be replaced by Al, indicating a stronger Al-Si bond strength and confirming the chemical sensitivity of the light scattering in RDA. Low temperature depositions (in the 300’C range) are shown to lead to the formation of Al (or Ga) metallic wires on the Si(111) terraces. Continued deposition of less than 10 monolayers at T below 250°C leads to a very anisotropic but patterned Al or Ga structure in registry with the substrate which retains an unexpectedly large polarizability for coverages as thick as 40 ml.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sung, K.T., Pang, S.W., Cole, M.W. and Pearce, N., J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 206 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Petroff, P.M.. Ultramicroscopy 31, 67 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Jung, T.M., Kaplan, R., and Prokes, S.M., Surf. Sci. Lett. 289, L577 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Jung, T.M., Prokes, S.M. and Kaplan, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A12, 1838 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Yater, J.E., Shih, A. and Idzerda, Y.U., Phys. Rev. B51, 7365 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Baski, A.A., Erwin, S.C. and Whitman, L.J., Surface Science, submitted.Google Scholar
7. Aspnes, D.E., Harbison, J.P., Studna, A.A. and Florez, L.T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A6, 1327(1988).Google Scholar
8. Glembocki, O.J. and Prokes, S.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2355 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Prokes, S.M. and Glembocki, O.J., J. Vacuum Sci. and Technol. B, submitted.Google Scholar
10. Prokes, S.M. and Glembocki, O.J., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 448, 217 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Hill, I.G. and McLean, A.B., Phys. Rev. B 56, 15725 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Good, Ronald H. Jr., and Nelson, Terence J., Classical Theory of Electric and Magnetic Fields, Academic Press, New York, 1971, p. 512.Google Scholar
13. Sanderson, R.T., Polar Covalence, (Academic Press, New York, 1983), p. 40.Google Scholar