Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:47:43.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-Situ Measurement of Actuation in Thin Films of Conducting Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Lauren C. Montemayor
Affiliation:
[email protected], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Priam Vasudevan Pillai
Affiliation:
[email protected]@gmail.com, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, 77 Massachusetts Ave 3-147, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, United States, 6172588628
Ian W Hunter
Affiliation:
[email protected], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Get access

Abstract

Conducting polymer materials can be developed as muscle-like actuators for applications in robotics, micro-electro mechanical systems, drug delivery systems etc. These materials are available in a large number of different varieties that can be synthesized and processed in different ways. However, their applications as actuators are limited due to the inability to create conducting polymer materials with robust mechanical properties. Currently most of the dynamic mechanical analysis technologies require the polymer created to be free standing and able to withstand large stresses. This severely limits the development of new materials with potential actuator applications. In this study, a technique to measure the actuation of polymers in the electrochemical deposition environment is described. This allows testing of an electrochemically grown conducting polymer sample on the surface of the deposition electrode itself. Thin polypyrrole films (2 to 20 microns thick) doped with tetraethylammonium hexaflourophosphate were grown on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode. These films were then tested on the surface of the glassy carbon using a custom built electrochemical dynamic mechanical analyzer. A square wave potential (+/- 0.8 V) is applied to the films that results in the actuation of the films. The films are able to generate a changing force of 3 mN of force against a 0.1 N sensor preloaded at 5 mN. The resulting magnitude of the measured force is a function of the film thickness while the change in force due to actuation is approximately constant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bar-Cohen, Y., Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles: Reality, Potential, and Challenges, SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, (2001).Google Scholar
2 Madden, J. D. Science 311 (5767), 15591560 (2006).Google Scholar
3 Anquetil, P. Rinderknecht, D. Vandesteeg, N., Madden, J. and Hunter, I. Large strain desteeg, actuation in polypyrrole actuators in SPIE Smart Structures and Materials 2004: Electroactive Polymers Actuators and Devices, ed by Yoseph, Bar-Cohen. San Diego, CA., vol 5385 pp. 380387, (2004).Google Scholar
4 Madden, P. Madden, J. Anqetil, P. Yu, H. Swager, T. and Hunter, I. Conducting Polymers as Building Blocks for Biomimetic Systems in Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, ed by Anonymous. (2002).Google Scholar
5 Jager, E. W. H. Smela, E. Inganas, O. and Lundstrom, I. Synth. Met. 102 (1-3), 13091310 (1999).Google Scholar
6 Vandesteeg, N.. PhD Thesis, “Synthesis and Characterization of Conducting Polymer Actuators Actuators.” Massachusettes Institute of Technology. (2006).Google Scholar
7 Pytel, R. Thomas, E. and Hunter, I., Chemistry of Materials 18 (4), 861863 (2006).Google Scholar
8 Pytel, Rachel. PhD Thesis, “Artificial Muscle Morphology: Structure/Property relationships in Polypyrrole Actuators.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2007).Google Scholar
9 Smela, E. and Gadegaard, N., J Phys Chem B105 (39), 93959405 (2001).Google Scholar
10 Smela, E. and Gadegaard, N., Adv Mater 11 (11), 953 (1999).Google Scholar
11 Pytel, R. Thomas, E. and Hunter, I., Polymer 49, 20082013 (2008).Google Scholar
12 Madden, J. Hunter, I. W. and Gilbert, R. J. Gastroenterology 122 (4), A164–A164 (2002).Google Scholar
13 Madden, J. Madden, P. Anquetil, P. and Hunter, I. “Load and Time Dependence of Displacement in a Conducting Polymer,” MRS Symposium Procedings Procedings, vol 698, pp 137144. Warrendale, Pa.; Materials Research Society. (2002)Google Scholar
14 Wu, Y. Alici, G. Spinks, G. M. and Wallace, G. G. Synth. Met. 156 (16-17), 10171022 (2006).Google Scholar
15 Takashima, W. Pandey, S. S. and Kaneto, K., Sensors & Actuators: B. Chemical 89 (1-2), 4852 (2003).Google Scholar