Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:21:16.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In-situ Development and Study of Conducting Polymer Electrodes on PVDF Substrates for Electro-Acoustic Application in Cochlear Implants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Arpit Dwivedi  and
Rodney Roseman
Arpit Dwivedi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH 45221-0012
Rodney Roseman
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH 45221-0012
Get access

Abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss (profound deafness) is a result of the inability of the transductory structures in the cochlea (organ of Corti) to convert the mechanical displacement of the basilar membrane to neural signals. A class of devices known as Cochlear Implants can significantly enhance the hearing ability in these patients. Fundamentally different from the existing cochlear implant technology, are the totally implantable piezoelectric based devices that are being developed. The unit is completely self-contained, designed to work without any signal amplifiers or transmission elements, greatly simplifying the stimulation process, and enhancing the cosmetic appearance of the patient. These devices utilize the bending piezoelectric effect. Device design consists of arrays of elements of piezoelectric polymer films with conducting polymer electrodes embedded in a flexible substrate with the whole device coated with an insulating layer. The incoming mechanical energy (pressure waves) into the cochlea generates electrical charge by virtue of the piezoelectric effect of the film. The generated charge is fed to electrical connections evaporated on the substrate and is used to stimulate surviving nerve fibers in the cochlea. In certain environments where acoustic impedance matching is limited by size constraints and conducting liquid medium, the advantage of polymer based devices over ceramics and metal based devices, are their flexibility, low acoustic impedance, and high sensitivity. However, in order to utilize these useful properties, the electrode material is an important issue, since the conventionally used metal electrodes, have high acoustic impedance and also impose mechanical clamping on the soft polymer which can significantly reduce the electromechanical efficiency of the transducer. Due to its flexibility, strong coherent interfaces, and significantly improved acoustic transparency, such an all-polymer electroactive system is compared to a metal-polymer system of similar design and also compared to the current technology.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 771: Symposium L – Organic and Polymeric Materials and Devices , 2003 , L4.46
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fravel, R. P.. Cochlear implant electronics made simple. The Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 19(2): XI–XXII, 1986.Google Scholar
2. Johnson, L. G.. Cochlear Implants. Croom-Helm, 1985.Google Scholar
3. Cohn, A.. Medical Audiology: Disorders of hearing. Prentice-Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
4. Feigenbaum, E.. Cochlear implant devices for the profoundly hearing impaired. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 6(2):10–21, 1987.Google Scholar
5. Clark, G. M. and Tong, Y. C.. Cochlear Implants. Croom-Helm, 1985.Google Scholar
6. Haertling, G. H.. Piezoelectric and electro-optic ceramics. In Buchanan, R. C., editor, Ceramic Materials for Electronics. Marcel Dekker, 2nd edition, 1991.Google Scholar
7. Molson, A. J. and Herbert, J. M.. Electroceramics: Materials, Properties and Applications. Chapman and Hall, 1990.Google Scholar
8. Mason, W. P.. Piezoelectric Crystals and their Applications to Ultrasonics. D. van Nostrand, 1950.Google Scholar
9. Sawyer, A.B.. The use of Rochelle salt crystals for electrical reproducers and microphones. In I.Groves, D., editor, Acoustic Transducers. Hutchinson Ross, 1981.Google Scholar
10. Tamura, M., Yamaguchi, T., Oyaba, T., and Yoshimi, T.. Electroacoustic transducers with Piezoelectric high polymer films. Audio Eng. Soc. Journal, 23:21, 1975.Google Scholar
11. , Hai-Sheng, , Xu, Cheng, Z.-Y., Bharti, Vivek, Wang, Shexi, Zhang, Q.M. Journal of Applied Polymer science, Vol. 75, 945–951.Google Scholar
12. Cheng, Z.-Y., Xu, H.S., Zhang, Q.M., Wang, P.-C. and MacDiarmid, A.G. in Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices, edited by Bar-Cohen, Yoseph (SPIE Proc. 3669, Newport beach, CA, 1999) pp. 140–148.Google Scholar
13. Shen, Youqing, Wan, Meixiang, Synthetic Metals 96 (1998) 127–132.Google Scholar
14. Mukherjee, N., Ph.D. thesis, University of Cincinnati, 2003.Google Scholar
15. Mukherjee, N., Roseman, R.D. and Willging, J. P., Journal of Biomed, Matls, Res. (Appl. Biomat.) 53, pp. 181–187, 2000.Google Scholar
16. Mukherjee, N. and Roseman, R. D., MRS Symp. Proc. 604, pp. 79–84, 2000.Google Scholar
17. Huang, Z., Wang, P.-C., and Macdiarmid, A., Langmuir 13, pp. 6480–6484, 1997.Google Scholar
18. , Perruchot, Chehimi, M., Delamar, M., Cabet-Deliry, E., Miksa, B., Slomkowski, S., Khan, M. A., and Armes, S. P., Colloid Polymer Science 278, pp. 1139–1154, 2000.Google Scholar
19. Wang, P., Huang, Z., and Macdiarmid, A., Synthetic Metals 101, pp. 852–853, 1999.Google Scholar