Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:39:58.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Starting Material on Bi2sr2cacu2o8 Fibers Grown by the Float Zone Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Linda V. Moulton ,
Joseph M. Brenner ,
Robert J. Raymakers ,
Perla N. Peszkin  and
Robert S. Feigelson
Linda V. Moulton
Affiliation:
Material Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Joseph M. Brenner
Affiliation:
Material Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Robert J. Raymakers
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Perla N. Peszkin
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Robert S. Feigelson
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

A miniaturized float zone technique using laser heating has been found to have potential for producing superconducting fibers of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 which can carry high currents. Growth stability and growth rate, however, need to be improved if this technique is to be useful for preparing long lengths of 30 μπι diameter high quality fibers for property evaluation and prototype devices. One of the first requirements toward achieving this goal is the preparation of dense, homogeneous starting material. Work on different strategies for starting material preparation are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 169: Symposium M – High Temperature Superconductors: Fundamental Properties and Novel Materials Processing , 1989 , 291
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Feigelson, R. S., J. Crystal Growth 79, 669 (1986).Google Scholar
3 Feigelson, R. S., Gazit, D., Fork, D. K. and Geballe, T. H., Science 240, 1642‐1645 (1988).Google Scholar
4 Gazit, D. and Feigelson, R. S., J. Crystal Growth 91, 318‐330 (1988).Google Scholar
5 Gazit, D., Peszkin, P. N., Moulton, L. V. and Feigelson, R. S., J. Crystal Growth (to be published).Google Scholar
6 Gazit, D., Peszkin, P. N., Moulton, L. V. and Feigelson, R. S., in The Minerals, Metals and Materials Soc. Symp. Proc. High Temperature Superconducting Compounds: Processing and Related Properties, edited by Whang, S. H. and Das Gupta, A. (1989), p. 451.Google Scholar
7 Moulton, L. V., Peszkin, P. N. and Feigelson, R. S. (unpublished).Google Scholar
8 Nassau, K., Miller, A. E., and Gyorgy, E. M., Mat. Res. Bull. 24, 711 (1989).Google Scholar
9 Ono, A., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 1372 (1989).Google Scholar
10 Tallon, J. L., et al. , Nature 333, 153 (1988).Google Scholar
11 Sunshine, S. A., et al. , Phys. Rev. Bull. 38, 893 (1988).Google Scholar