Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:25:34.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Interstitial Oxygen on the Lattice Parameters of Solution-Treated and Aged Ti-8.6 wt% Al Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

G. T. Gray III
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos, New Mexico87545
A. C. Lawson
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos, New Mexico87545
Get access

Abstract

Neutron powder diffraction data have been obtained on Ti-8.6wt.% Al alloys with three different oxygen contents ( 500, 1000, and 2000 ppm) in the solution-treated and aged condition ( containing α2) to investigate possible oxygen and aluminum ordering and lattice parameter variations. The lattice parameters “a” and “c” were found to depend on the oxygen content and heat-treatment condition. Consistent with the literature lattice parameter data on pure Ti, the “a” lattice parameter of the solution-treated Ti-8.6Al material is relatively insensitive to the oxygen content while the “c” parameter increases with increasing oxygen. Following aging to precipitate the ordered α2, the “c” lattice parameter in the Ti-8.6Al alloys still exhibits a positive dependence on oxygen content with aging and a slight “c” increase over the solution-treated condition. The “a” lattice parameter following aging is observed to be lower than the solution-treated value, particularly for the 1000 and 2000ppm alloys. The diffraction data will be discussed in light of parallel electron microscopy results and literature data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Paton, N.E., Williams, J.C., and Rauscher, G.P., in Titanium Science and Technology, edited by Jaffee, R.I. and Burte, H.M. (Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 2, 1973), p. 1049–69.Google Scholar
2. Lim, J.Y., McMahon, C.J. Jr., Pope, D.P., and Williams, J.C., Metall. Trans. 7A, 139 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Williams, J.C., Sommer, A.W., and Tung, P.P.: Metall. Trans. 3, 2979 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Blackburn, M.J. and Williams, J.C., Trans. ASM 62, 398 (1969).Google Scholar
5. Conrad, H., Prog. Mater. Sci. 26, 123 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Truax, D.J. and McMahon, C.J. Jr., Mater. Sci. Eng. 13, 125 (1974).Google Scholar
7. Williams, J.C. and Luetjering, G., in Titanium '80 - Science and Technology, edited by Kimura, H. and Izumi, O. (AIME, New York, Vol. 1, 1980), p. 672681.Google Scholar
8. Luetjering, G. and Weissman, S., Acta Metall. 18, 785 (1970).Google Scholar
9. Liu, Z. and Welsch, G., Metall. Trans. 19, 527 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Gehlen, P.C., in The Science. Technology. and Application of Titanium, edited by Jaffee, R.I. and Promisel, N.E. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1970), p. 349357.Google Scholar
11. Gray, G.T. III, Luetjering, G., and Williams, J.C.: “The Influence of Oxygen on the Structure, Fracture, and Fatigue Crack Propagation of Ti-8.6Ar”, Metall. Trans., in press (1989).Google Scholar
12. Larson, A.C. and Dreele, R.B. Von, “Generalized Structure Analysis System”, Los Alamos National Laboratory, LAUR-86-748 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Clark, H.T. Jr., Trans. AIME 185, 588 (1949).Google Scholar
14. Clark, D., Jepson, K.S., and Lewis, G.I., J. Inst. Metals 91, 197 (1962-1963).Google Scholar
15. Gupta, D. and Weinig, S., Acta Metall. 10, 292 (1962).Google Scholar