Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:09:40.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of carbon nanotube grafting on chemo-electrical properties of Conductive Polymer nanoComposites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Mickaël Castro
Affiliation:
[email protected], European University of Brittany, LIMATB, Lorient, France
Jianbo Lu
Affiliation:
[email protected], European University of Brittany, LIMATB, Lorient, France
Bijandra Kumar
Affiliation:
[email protected], European University of Brittany, LIMATB, Lorient, France
Stéphane Bruzaud
Affiliation:
[email protected], European University of Brittany, LIMATB, Lorient, France
Jean-François Feller
Affiliation:
[email protected], European University of Brittany, LIMATB, Lorient, France
Get access

Abstract

New unique abilities towards solvents' vapor of electrically Conductive Polymer nanoComposites (CPCs) have made it a subject, holding the attention of research groups. The direct conversion from chemical information into an electrical signal can take advantage of existing low power microelectronics and sensing technology such as detection of toxic vapor; environmental monitoring in chemical industry and quality control in food processing, beverage and perfume industry. Conductive Polymer nanoComposite (CPC) is a heterogeneous system consisting of insulated polymer matrices and conductive nanofillers. In this paper we have investigated a new route for CNT grafting via ring opening polymerization of e-caprolactone. The influence of this treatment on chemo-electrical properties of the so-called CPC based sensor was investigated in this work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Feller, J.F., Grohens, Y., Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2004, 97, 231242.Google Scholar
2. Feller, J.F., Langevin, D., Marais, S.. Synth. Met. 2004, 144, 8188.Google Scholar
3. Feller, J.F., Grohens, Y., Synth. Met. 2005, 154, 193196.Google Scholar
4. Feller, J. F., Linossier, I., Grohens, Y., Materials Letters 57 (2002) 6471.Google Scholar
5. Feller, J. F., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 91(2004) 21512157.Google Scholar
6. Shevade, A.V., Ryan, M.A., Homer, M.L., Manfreda, A.M., Zhou, H., Manatt, K.S., Sens. Actuators B 93 (2003) 8491.Google Scholar
7. Koscho, M. E., Grubbs, R. H., Lewis, N. S., Anal. Chem., 74 (2004) 13071315.Google Scholar
8. Iijima, S., Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon, Nature 354 (1991) 56–8.Google Scholar
9. Coleman, J. N., Khan, U., Blau, W. J., Gun'ko, Y. K., Carbon 44 (2006) 16241652.Google Scholar
10. Sung, Y.T., Han, M.S., Song, K.H., Jung, J.W., Lee, H.S., Kum, C.K., Jooc, J., Kim, W.N., Polymer 47 (2006) 44344439.Google Scholar
11. Calvert, P., Nature 399 (1999) 210211.Google Scholar
12. Lau, Kin-Tak, Hui, David, Composites Part B: Engineering, 2002, 33, 263277 Google Scholar
13. Bruzaud, S., Carpentier, J.F., Grohens, Y., Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2004, 289, 531538 Google Scholar
14. Bruzaud, S., Grohens, Y., Ilinca, S., Carpentier, J.F., Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2005, 290, 11061114 Google Scholar
15. Liu, P., Eur. Polym. J., 2005, 41, 11, 26932703.Google Scholar