Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:28:32.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indentation Characterisation of Carbon Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

John S. Field
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Applied Physics, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia, and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
M. V. Swain
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Applied Physics, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia, and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Get access

Abstract

High precision force-displacement measurements of various forms of glassy and graphitic carbon have been made with a Berkovich and spherical tipped indenter. The force-displacement data show almost complete recovery despite contact pressures exceeding a considerable fraction of the elastic modulus. With a spherical tipped indenter the transition from elastic to inelastic response could be readily identified. It was found that the extent of the hysteretic response with a spherical indenter increased with increasing load. Only minor differences in the force-displacement response of crystalline graphite indented normal to the basal plane and the glassy carbon was identified. A simple model for interpreting the force-displacement data is developed. These results are compared with indentations made on diamond like carbon films on various substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Blackslee, O.L., Proctor, D.G., Seldin, E.J., Spence, G.B. and Weng, T., J.Appl. Phys., 41, 3373 (1970).Google Scholar
2. Kelly, B.T., “The Physics of Graphite”, Appl. Sci. Publ., Lond. (1981).Google Scholar
3. Jenkins, G.M., Brit. J. Appl. Phys., 13, 30 (1962).Google Scholar
4. Kotlensky, W.V. and Martens, H.E., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 48, 35 (1965).Google Scholar
5. Skinner, J. and Gane, N., Phil. Mag., 28, 827 (1973)Google Scholar
6. Jenkins, G. M. and Kawamura, K., “Polymeric Carbons-Carbon Fibre, Glass and Char”, Camb. Uni. Press (1976).Google Scholar
7. Shiraishi, M., Kaitei Tansozairyo Nyuma. Carbon Soc. Japan Tokyo 29 (1984)Google Scholar
8. Sakai, M., Acta. Metall. & Mater., 41, 1751 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Sakai, M., Hanyu, H. and Inagaki, M., Proc. Int Symp. on Carbon, Tsukuba, Japan (1990).Google Scholar
10. Mencik, J. and Swain, M. V., Materials Forum 18, 277 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res., 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Loubet, J-L., Georges, J.M., Marchesini, J. and Mielle, G., J. Tribol. 106, 43 (1984).Google Scholar
13. Sneddon, I.N., Int. J. Engng. Sci., 3, 47 (1965).Google Scholar
14. Johnson, K.L., “Contact Mechanics”, Camb. Uni. Press (199?).Google Scholar
15. Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., J. Mater. Res., 8, 297 (1993).Google Scholar
16. Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., J. Mater. Res., 10, 101 (1995).Google Scholar
17. Tabor, D., “Hardness of Materials”, Oxford Uni. Press (1951).Google Scholar
18. Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., in preparation.Google Scholar
19. Gao, H., Chiu, C.H. and Lee, J., Int. J. Solids and Struct., 29, 2471 (1992).Google Scholar