Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:48:51.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Situ Composites Prepared By Solidification And Mechanical Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. D. Verhoeven*
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory*and Department of Materials Science and Engineering Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011USA
Get access

Abstract

An alternate in situ technique is presented for preparation of aligned microstructures which has been successfully applied to the preparation of copper alloys. In this technique, a two phase alloy is first prepared by conventional casting techniques to produce a random array of dendrites of phase 1 in a matrix of phase 2. The casting is then reduced to wire size by mechanical reductions. It is demonstrated that the alignment of the dendritic phase produced by the mechanical reduction is surprisingly good, and that one can achieve a wide range of microstructural control over the filament size and morphology by utilization of controlled coarsening anneals followed by additional wire drawing. Examples are presented of Cu-Nb alloys which are converted to Nb3 Sn-Cu superconducting wires possessing excellent critical current values, and of Fe-Cu alloys which produce wires having quite high strength to resistivity ratios.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Foner, S., McNiff, E. J. Jr., Schwartz, B. B., and Roberge, R., Appl.Phys. Lett., 31 (1977) p. 853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Verhoeven, J. D., Finnemore, D. K., Gibson, E. D., Ostenson, J. E., and Goodrick, L. F., Appl. Phys. Lett., 33 (1978) p. 101.Google Scholar
3. Harbison, J. P., and Bevk, J., J. Appl. Phys., 48 (1977) p. 5180.Google Scholar
4. Hosford, W. F. Jr., Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 230 (1964) p. 12.Google Scholar
5. Sue, J. J., Verhoeven, J. D., Gibson, E. D., Ostenson, J. E., and Finnemore, D. K., Adv. Cry. Engr. Materials, 28 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Gibson, E. D., Ostenson, J. E., Sue, J. J., Verhoeven, J. D., and Finnemore, D. K., Adv. Cry. Engr. Materials, 28 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Ekin, J. W., IEEE Trans. Mag., MAG–15 (1979) p. 197.Google Scholar
8. Braginski, A. I., and Wagner, G. R., IEEE Trans. Mag., MAG–17 (1981) p. 243.Google Scholar
9. Kumakura, H., Togana, K., and Tachikawa, K., Adv. Cry. Engr. Materials, 28 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Bevk, J., Harbison, J. P. and Bell, J. L., J. Appl. Phys. 49 (1979) p. 6031.Google Scholar
11. Breme, J., Metall., 31 (1977) 1218.Google Scholar
12. Stevenson, W. D. Jr., Elements in Power System Analysis, p. 353, McGraw-Hill, NY (1955).Google Scholar
13. Dublon, G., Habbal, F. and Bevk, J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 39 (1981) 660.Google Scholar