Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:31:19.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved Routes towards Solution Deposition of Indium Sulfide Thin Films for Photovoltaic Applications:

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Kuveshni Govender ,
David Smyth-Boyle  and
Paul O'Brien
Kuveshni Govender
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and the Materials Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
David Smyth-Boyle
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and the Materials Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Paul O'Brien
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and the Materials Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Get access

Abstract

Conditions necessary for the reproducible deposition of pristine In2S3 thin films on TO-glass substrates by low temperature solution deposition have been identified. Baths containing carboxylic acids yield adherent, specular and crystalline films, within a defined pH range, dependent on the particular acid employed. Films have been characterised by XRD, SEM, XPS and electronic spectroscopy. As–deposited films were found to crystallise as tetragonal β-In2S3, no evidence for incorporation of hydroxy-indium species was found by XPS measurements.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 692: Symposium H – Progress in Semiconductor Materials for Optoelectronic Applications , 2001 , H9.33.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yu, S., Shu, L., Qian, Y., Xie, Y., Yang, J. and Yang, L., Mater. Res. Bull, 33, 717, (1998).Google Scholar
2. Hara, K., Saya, K. and Arakawa, H., Solar Energy Mater. & Solar Cells, 62, 441, (2001).Google Scholar
3. Rehwald, W. and Harbeke, G., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 26, 1309, (1965).Google Scholar
4. Giles, J.M., Hatwell, H., Offergeld, G. and Van Cakenberghe, J., J. Phys. Status Solidi, 2, K73, (1962).Google Scholar
5. Diehl, R. and Nitsche, R., J. Cryst. Growth, 28, 306, (1975).Google Scholar
6. Lockhande, C.D., Ennaoui, A., Patil, P.S., Giersig, M., Diesner, K., Muller, M. and Tributsch, H., Thin Solid Films, 340, 18, (1999).Google Scholar
7. Hariskos, D., Ruckh, M., Rühle, U., Walter, T., Schock, H.W., Hedström, J. and Stolt, L., Solar Energy Mater. & Solar Cells, 41/42, 345, (1996).Google Scholar
8. Huang, C.H., Li, S.S., Shafarman, W.N., Chang, S.H., Lambers, E.S., Rieth, L., Johnson, J.W., Kim, S., Stanberry, B.J., Anderson, T.J. and Holloway, P.H., Solar Energy Mater. & Solar Cells, 69, 131, (2001).Google Scholar
9. Bayón, R., Maffiotte, C. and Herrero, J., Thin Solid Films, 353, 100, (1999).Google Scholar
10. Barreau, N., Marsillac, S., Bernède, J.C., Vacuum, 56, 101, (2000).Google Scholar
11. Wagner, C.D. in: Practical Surface Analysis, Vol.1, edited by Briggs, D. and Seah, M.P. (Wiley, Chichester, 1990) pp 614.Google Scholar
12. Moulder, J.F., Sticke, W.F., Sobol, P.E., Bomben, K.D., Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, 1992.Google Scholar