Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:14:26.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of X-Ray Tomographic Microscopy on Deformation Studies of a SiC/Al MMC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

T.M. Breunig
Affiliation:
Mechanical Properties Research Laboratory and School of Materials Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332–0245
S.R. Stock
Affiliation:
Mechanical Properties Research Laboratory and School of Materials Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332–0245
J.H. Kinney
Affiliation:
Chemistry and Materials Science Department, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
A. Guvenilir
Affiliation:
Mechanical Properties Research Laboratory and School of Materials Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332–0245
M.C. Nichols
Affiliation:
Materials Department, Sandia National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550.
Get access

Abstract

Damage in a continuous, aligned-fiber SiC/Al metal matrix composite (MMC), e.g. fiber fracture, fiber-matrix interphase microcracking, intra-ply matrix voids and cracks, is examined with synchrotron x-ray tomographic microscopy (XTM). Quantitative three-dimensional measurements of damage are reported in as-fabricated and monotonically loaded SiC/Al. The XTM results indicate that increases in observed macroscopic structural stiffness during the first few fatigue cycles of an MMC coupon correspond to elimination of processing-related matrix porosity and to displacement of the fibers from a somewhat irregular arrangement into a more nearly hexagonal array. The XTM data also show that the carbon cores of the SiC fibers begin to fail at or below 828 MPa, that is, at loads far less than those for fracture of the entire fiber. The implications of these results and of the use of in situ loading for fatigue damage quantification are also discussed for mechanical/thermal modelling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bonse, U., Johnson, Q.C., Nichols, M.C., Nusshardt, R., Krasnicki, S., and Kinney, J.H.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A246, 644 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Kinney, J.H., Saroyan, R.A., Nichols, M.C., Breunig, T.M., and Stock, S.R.: this volume.Google Scholar
3. Kinney, J.H., Stock, S.R., Nichols, M.C., Bonse, U., Breunig, T.M., Saroyan, R.A., Nusshardt, R., Johnson, Q.C., Busch, F., and Antolovich, S.D.: J Mater. Res., 5, (5),112 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Barrows, R.G., in Failure Modes in Composites IV. edited by Cornie, J.A. and Crossman, F.W. (The Metallurgical Society of AIME Publishers, 1979), pp. 4572.Google Scholar
5. McHenry, K.D., and Tressler, R.E.: J. Compos. Mat., 9, 73 (1975).Google Scholar