Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:01:50.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imaging, Manipulating, and Analyzing with Nanometer Precision: Application of the Nanoworkbench

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Olivier Guise ,
Joachim Ahner ,
Jeremy Levy  and
John T. Yates Jr.
Olivier Guise
Affiliation:
Surface Science Center Center for Oxide Semiconductor Materials for Quantum Computation, Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Tel: 412–624–8320, FAX: 412–624–6003
Joachim Ahner
Affiliation:
Surface Science Center Center for Oxide Semiconductor Materials for Quantum Computation, Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Tel: 412–624–8320, FAX: 412–624–6003 Seagate Technology, Pittsburgh, PA 15222
Jeremy Levy
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, Tel: 412–624–8320, FAX: 412–624–6003
John T. Yates Jr.
Affiliation:
Surface Science Center Center for Oxide Semiconductor Materials for Quantum Computation, Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Tel: 412–624–8320, FAX: 412–624–6003 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, Tel: 412–624–8320, FAX: 412–624–6003
Get access

Abstract

We report the development of novel nanometer-scale manipulative and analytical devices for imaging, chemically analyzing and manipulating nanometer-scaled materials. Two different versions of the nanoworkbench are operating currently at the Surface Science Center of the University of Pittsburgh and at the Seagate Research Center in Pittsburgh. The instrument at Seagate consists of a modified commercially available high resolution scanning electron microscope (lateral resolution ∼1 nm at 10 kV) in combination with a set of four unique nano-manipulators, operating in the pressure range from 102 to 10−7 mbar. At the University of Pittsburgh a home-built UHV version of the nanoworkbench is in operation. In this UHV-instrument, several inter-connected UHV chambers allow in-situ deposition of thin-films and conventional surface analysis. The resolution of the SEM of the UHV system is limited to about 50 nm. We report the first results obtained by using both versions of the nanoworkbench, where we succeeded in writing patterns of ultra-small carbon-containing dots (8nm in diameter) with high position accuracy (<5nm) by electron-beam-induced deposition of carbon-containing background gases. Additionally, four-point probe measurements were performed on a SiGe system.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 803: Symposia GG/HH – Advanced Characterization Techniques for Data Storage Materials – Phase Change and Nonmagnetic Materials for Data Storage , 2003 , GG3.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Goldstein, Joseph, Newbury, Dale, Joy, David C., Lyman, Charles E., Echlin, Patrick, Lifshin, Eric, Sawyer, Linda, Michael, Joseph R., Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, 3rd edition. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2003);Google Scholar
Meyer, E., Hug, H. J., and Bennewitz, R., Scanning Probe Microscopy: The Lab on a Tip. (Springer Verlag, New York, 2003).Google Scholar
2 Hasegawa, S. and Grey, F., Surf. Sci. 500, 84 (2002).Google Scholar
3 Ahner, J., MSTnews 4 (4), 16 (1999).Google Scholar
4 Van der Pauw, L. J., Philips Res. Reports 13, 1 (1958).Google Scholar
5 Voigtlander, B., Surface Science Reports 43, 127 (2001).Google Scholar
6 Mo, Y.-W., Savage, D. E., Swartzentruber, B. S., and Lagally, M. G., Physical Review Letters 65 (8), 1020 (1990).Google Scholar
7 Schmidt, O. G., Lange, C., Eberl, K., Kienzle, O., and Ernst, F., Applied Physics Letters 71 (16), 2340 (1997).Google Scholar
8 Koops, H. W. P., Weiel, R., Kern, D. P., and Baum, T. H., Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 6 (1), 477 (1988);Google Scholar
Lee, K. L. and Hatzakis, M., Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 7 (6), 1941 (1989).Google Scholar
9 Guise, O., Marbach, H., Levy, J., Ahner, J., and Yates, J. T. Jr, in preparation.Google Scholar
10 Petersen, C. L., Grey, F., Shiraki, I., and Hasegawa, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 (23), 3782 (2000);Google Scholar
Hasegawa, S., Shiraki, I., Tanikawa, T., Petersen, C. L., Hansen, T. M., Boggild, P., and Grey, F., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 8379 (2002);Google Scholar
Kanagawa, T., Hobara, R., Matsuda, I., Tanikawa, T., Natori, A., and Hasegawa, S., Physical Review Letters 91 (3), 036805 (2003).Google Scholar
11 Montgomery, H. C., J. Appl. Phys. 42, 2971 (1971);Google Scholar
Price, W. L. V., J. Phys. D. 5, 1127 (1972).Google Scholar
12 Koon, D. W. and Knickerboxer, C. J., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63 (1), 207 (1992).Google Scholar
13 Guise, O., Ahner, J., Jung, M.-C., Goughnour, P. C., and Yates, J. T. Jr, Nanoletters 2 (3), 191 (2002).Google Scholar