Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:30:21.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrothermal Synthesis of the Deep-UV NLO Material Sr2Be2B2O7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Joseph W. Kolis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634–0973, U.S.A.
Colin D. McMillen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634–0973, U.S.A.
Taina Franco
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634–0973, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The synthesis of non-linear optical (NLO) materials that are transparent into the deep-UV (<200 nm) region is an important component in the development of advanced optical technology. Such materials are sought after for their potential applications in the fields of high resolution photolithography, micro-machining, and laser spectroscopy. Borates are one class of solid-state materials that have received consideration for these applications because of their favorable physical and optical properties. One such compound, Sr2Be2B2O7 (SBBO) has been reported to be transparent below 200 nm, and exhibits a large second harmonic generation (SHG) coefficient. Significant difficulties in the flux growth of large, high quality crystals have prevented this material from further development. We have successfully grown large crystals of SBBO by a hydrothermal synthetic method for the first time, and have characterized their physical properties. The synthesis and structure of a new material encountered during the synthesis of SBBO, LiBeSr2B3O8, is also reported here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Schaeffer, R., and Hannon, T., Laser Focus World, 37, 115118 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Keszler, D.A., Curr. Opin. In Sol. St. Mat. Sci. 1, 204211 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Chen, C., Ye, N., Lin, J., Zeng, W., and Wu, B., Adv. Mater‥ 11, 10711078 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Sasaki, T., Mori, Y., Yoshimura, M., Yap, K.Y., and Kamimura, T., Mater. Sci. Eng. 30, 154 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Chen, C., Laser Focus World, 40, 9195 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Chen, C., Wang, Y., Wu, B., Wu, K., Zeng, W., and Yu, L., Nature, 373, 322324 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Laudise, R.A., Prog. Inorg. Chem. 3, 145 (1962).Google Scholar
8. Kolis, J.W. and Korzenski, M.B., Chemical Synthesis using Supercritical Fluids, Jessop, P. G.; Leitner, W. (Eds): Wiley-VCH: New York, NY, (1999) pp. 213242.Google Scholar
9. Sheldrick, G.M., SHELXTL software package, Version 6.1. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, (1999).Google Scholar
10. Kurtz, S.K. and Perry, T.T., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 37983813 (1968).Google Scholar
11. We thank P. Shiv Halasyamani for performing this experiment.Google Scholar
12. Xue, D., Betzler, K., Hesse, H., Sol. St. Comm. 114, 2125 (2000).Google Scholar
13. Xue, D., Betzler, K., Hesse, H., Trends in Optics and Photonics Series, 34, 542547 (2000).Google Scholar
14. Mercer, R.A., Miller, R.P., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 28, 6176 (1966).Google Scholar
15. Shaffers, K.I. and Keszler, D.A., J. Sol. St. Chem. 85, 270274 (1990).Google Scholar
16. Shaffers, K.I. and Keszler, D.A., Inorg. Chem. 33, 12011204 (1994).Google Scholar
17. Smith, R.W. and Keszler, D.A., J. Sol. St. Chem. 129, 184188 (1997).Google Scholar