Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:46:32.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydration Effects on the Viscoelastic Properties of Collagen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

M Ntim
Affiliation:
[email protected], Queen Mary, University of London, United Kingdom
Amanpreet Bembey
Affiliation:
[email protected], Queen Mary, University of London, United Kingdom
Virginia Ferguson
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Colorado, United States
Andrew Bushby
Affiliation:
[email protected], Queen Mary, University of London
Get access

Abstract

The manner in which liquid interacts with collagen is unclear, with changes in hydration presenting ambiguity. At present, elastic modulus values for collagen quoted range from MPa to GPa. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) of collagen in isolation provides an insight into the mechanical changes due to altered hydration states.

Changes in the viscoelastic properties of collagen were examined as the material was systematically dehydrated in a series of water:solvent mixes to examine effects of dehydration. The effect of solvents with varying polarity was also examined. Tails from 11-week old wild type mice were used. Mouse tail is a tissue with a well-defined, hierarchical organization of type I collagen. The viscoelastic response of collagen was measured using dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) in fiber extension mode over the frequency range of 1Hz to 10Hz. Samples were sequentially dehydrated in a series of solvent concentrations: 70% ethanol to 100% ethanol to 100% acetone and 70% ethanol to 70% methanol to 100% methanol for at least 1h. Selectively removing and then replacing water from collagen samples provides insight into the role of water in the ultrastructure of the tissue from the corresponding changes in the experimentally determined elastic modulus and viscous energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bembey, AK, Koonjul, V, Bushby, AJ, Ferguson, VL and Boyde, A. MRS Proc. 841, R2.7.16 (2005)Google Scholar
2. Saito, H and Yokoi, M, J. Biochem (Tokyo) 111:376 (1992)Google Scholar
3. Nalla, RK, Balooch, M, Ager, JW, Kruzic, JJ, Kinney, JH and Ritchie, RO. Acta Biomaterialia. 1:31 (2005)Google Scholar
4. Bushby, AJ, Ferguson, VL and Boyde, A. J. Mater. Res., 19(1):249 (2004)Google Scholar
5. Pashley, DH, Agee, KA, Carvalho, RM, Lee, K-W, Tay, FR and Callison, TE. Dental Materials, 19:347 (2003)Google Scholar
6. Boyde, A and Maconnachie, E. Scanning. 2:149 (1979)Google Scholar
7. Tooze, J. J Cell Biol, 22:551 (1964)Google Scholar
8. Sasaki, N and Enyo, A. J Biomech. 28(7):809 (1995)Google Scholar
9. Yamashita, J, Furman, BR, Rawls, HR, Wang, X, Agrawal, CM. J Biomed Mater Res. 58(1):47 (2001)Google Scholar