Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:37:14.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-Temperature Deformation Behavior of the γ Alloy Ti-48Ai-2Cr-2Nb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Donald S. Shih
Affiliation:
GE Aircraft Engines, Mail Drop M-89, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215–6301, USA
Gary K. Scarr
Affiliation:
GE Aircraft Engines, Mail Drop M-89, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215–6301, USA
Get access

Abstract

The hot-workability of a two-phase (γ+α2) alloy, Ti-48A1-2Cr-2Nb, has been studied by conducting isothermal compression tests to 0.8 true strain over the temperature range of 975–1200°C at strain rates between 1×l0−1 and 3×10−3s−1. A deformation map showing temperature, strain rate, soundness of deformation, and isostress contours was constructed. Good workability is found from the low temperature/low strain rate regime to combinations of high temperature and either high or low strain rate. The upper-limit flow stress for good workability is between 450 and 500 MPa. Deformation induced softening occurs at all conditions. SEM and TEM examinations of the deformed specimens reveal that non-uniform deformation takes place at all strain rates, but cracking occurs mostly at high strain rates (e.g. 1×10−1s−1), especially combined with low temperatures. The cracking appears to progress primarily along γ/α2interfaces. It is thought that non-uniform deformation develops channels of shear bands, which in turn promote localized recrystallization, thus accommodating higher strains.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. McAndrew, J.B. and Kessler, H.D., J. Metals, 8, 1348 (1956).Google Scholar
2. Huang, S-C., Patent, U.S. 4,879,092 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Shih, D.S., Huang, S-C., Scarr, G.K., Jang, H. and Chesnutt, J.C., Microstructure/Property Relationships in Titanium Alloys and Titanium Aluminides, edited by Boyer, R.R., Hall, J.A. and Kim, Y-W., TMS, Pittsburgh, PA (in press,1990).Google Scholar
4. Mitao, S., Kohsaka, Y. and Ouchi, C., Proc. of THERMEC-88 (Int'l Conf on Physical Metallurgy of Thermomechanical Processing of Steels and Other Metals Tokyo 1988 Google Scholar
5. Nobuki, M., Takahashi, J. and Tsujimoto, T., J. Japan Inst. Metals, 53, No. 8, 809 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Semiatin, S.L., Frey, N., Thompson, C.R., Bryant, J.D., El-Soudani, S. and Tisler, R, Scripta Metall., 24, 1403 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Sellars, C.M. and McG, W.J.. Tegart, Mem. Sci. Rev. Metall., 63, 731 (1966).Google Scholar
8. Martin, P.L., Mendiratta, M.G. and Lipsitt, H.A., Metall. Trans., 14A, 2170 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Shih, D.S. and Chesnutt, J.C., GE unpublished results (1989–90).Google Scholar