Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:34:15.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-Resolution Analytical Electron Microscopy Investigation of Metastable Tetragonal Phase Stabilization in Undoped, Sol-Gel Derived Zirconia Nanoceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Vladimir P. Oleshko
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904
James M. Howe
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904
Satyajit Shukla
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904
Sudipta Seal
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida, Advanced Materials Processing and Analysis Center & Mechanical Materials Aerospace Engineering Department, Orlando, Florida 32816
Get access

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying stabilization of the metastable tetragonal (t)-phase in sol-gel derived, nanocrystalline ZrO2 were studied by high-resolution analytical electron microscopy, utilizing parallel electron-energy loss (PEEL) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopies. The powders were synthesized by hydrolysis of Zr (IV) n-propoxide at ratios of molar concentration of water to Zr n-propoxide, R=5 and 60, respectively, followed by calcination at 400°C. Dense particles of the as-precipitated ZrO2 (R=5) revealed 4–11 nm-sized nanocrystals embedded in the amorphous matrix that may serve as nuclei for the t-phase during calcination. The calcined particles consist of 10–100 nm–sized t-crystals. For as-precipitated ZrO2 (R=60), week aggregates (50–100 nm) of largely amorphous 4–20 nm-sized particles after calcination yield a mixture of t-and monoclinic (m-) nanocrystals. PEELS fingerprints of the band structure with the intensity threshold matching the expected position of a direct bandgap at 4–5 eV allow to differentiate between the amorphous and nanocrystalline ZrO2. Stabilization of t-phase (R=5) with sizes up to 16 times larger than reported earlier is likely due to strain-induced confinement from surrounding growing grains, which suppress the volume expansion associated with the martensitic t-m transformation. For R=60, loose nanoparticle agglomerates cannot suppress the transformation. In this case, the t-phase may be partially stabilized due to a crystal size effect and /or to the presence of m-phase.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Goodenough, J. B., Nature 404, 821823 (2000).Google Scholar
[2] Ishikawa, T., Yamaoka, H., Harada, Y., Fujii, T. and Nagasawa, T., Nature 416, 6467 (2002).Google Scholar
[3] Kingon, A. I., Maria, J. P. and Streiffer, S. K., Nature 406, 10321038 (2000).Google Scholar
[4] Hannink, R. H. J., Kelly, P. M. and Muddle, B. C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83(6), 461–-487 (2000).Google Scholar
[5] Pavlik, R. S., Klein, L. C. and McCauley, R. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80(6), 14691476 (1997).Google Scholar
[6] Rignanese, G.-M., Detraux, F. and Gonze, X., Phys. Rev. B 64, 134301 1–7 (2001).Google Scholar
[7] Kelly, P. M. and Rose, L. R. F., Progr. Mater. Sci. 47, 463557 (2002).Google Scholar
[8] Shukla, S., Seal, S., Vij, R., Bandyopadhyay, S. and Rahman, Z., Nano Lett. 2(9) 989 (2002).Google Scholar
[9] Shukla, S., Seal, S. and Vanfleet, R. J., Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 27(2), 119136 (2003).Google Scholar
[10] Oleshko, V., Gijbels, R. and Amelinckx, S. in Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, edited by Meyers, R. A., (Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2000), pp. 90889120.Google Scholar
[11] Garvie, R. C., J. Phys. Chem. 69, 12381243 (1965).Google Scholar
[12] Mitsuhashi, T., Ichiara, M. and Tatsuke, V., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 57, 97 (1974).Google Scholar
[13] Nitsche, R., Rodewald, M., Skandan, G., Fuess, H., Hahn, H., Nanostruct. Mater. 7, 535(1996).Google Scholar
[14] Labar, J., in Proc. EUREM 12, edited by Frank, L., Ciampor, M., (Brno, 2000), p. I3791380.Google Scholar
[15] Oleshko, V. P., Howe, J. M., Shukla, S., Seal, S., Microsc. Microanal. 9 (Suppl. 2), 410 (2003).Google Scholar
[16] McComb, D. W., Phys. Rev. B 54, 70947102 (1996)Google Scholar