Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:14:47.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Highly Ionized Carbon Plasma Generation by Dual-Laser Ablation for Diamond-Like Carbon Film Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Witanachchi
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Advanced Materials Science and Technology (LAMSAT), Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
A. M. Miyawa
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Advanced Materials Science and Technology (LAMSAT), Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
P. Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Advanced Materials Science and Technology (LAMSAT), Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
Get access

Abstract

Carbon plasmas produced by excimer laser ablation show a low ionization yield of about 8-10%. The coupling of a second CO2laser pulse into the plasma in the dual-laser ablation process significantly increases the plasma temperature and the ionization. The resulting rapid expansion of the plasma gives rise to high ion kinetic energies and broader ion expansion profiles [1]. Optical emission spectroscopy and an ion probe have been used to investigate the dynamics of the carbon plasma. Single and dual-laser ablated carbon plumes have been deposited on DC-biased silicon substrates to form amorphous carbon films. The diamond-like behavior of these films was studied by Raman spectroscopy. The Raman spectra were deconvolved to gauge the effect of the density and the energy of ions on the formation of diamond-like sp3 -bonded carbon (DLC) films. The advantage offered by the dual-laser process for the growth of DLC films is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mukherjee, P, Cuff, J. B., and Witanachchi, S., Appl. Surface Sci. 127–129, 620 (1998).Google Scholar
2 Pool, F. S., Shing, Y. H., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 3276 (1984).Google Scholar
3 Matsumoto, O., Toshima, H., and Kanzaki, Y., Thin Solid Films 128, 341 (1985).Google Scholar
4 Capano, M. A., McDavitt, N. T., Singh, R. K., Qian, F., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 431 (1996).Google Scholar
5 Voevodin, A. A. and Donley, M. S., Surface and Coating Technology 82, 199 (1996).Google Scholar
6 Namba, Y. and Mori, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 319 (1985).Google Scholar
7 Weissmantel, C., Bewilogua, K., Dietrich, D., Erler, H. J., Hinneberg, H. J., Klose, S., Nowiek, W., and Reisse, G., Thin Solid Films 72, 19 (1980).Google Scholar
8 Ravi, S., Silva, P., Xu, S., Tay, B. X., Tan, H. S., and Milne, W. I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 491 (1996).Google Scholar
9 Weissmantel, C., Thin Solid Films 58, 101 (1979).Google Scholar
10 Merkulov, V. I., Lowndes, D. H., Jellison, G. E., Puretzky, A. A., and Geohegan, D. B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2591 (1998).Google Scholar
11 Voevodin, A. A., Laube, S. J. P., Walck, S. D., Solomon, J. S., Donley, M. S., and Zabinski, J. S., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 4123 (1995).Google Scholar
12 Witanachchi, S., Ying, Y., Miyawa, A. M., and Mukherjee, P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 485, 185 (1997).Google Scholar
13 Witanachchi, S., Ahmed, K., Sakthivel, P., and Mukherjee, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1469 (1995).Google Scholar
14 Witanachchi, S. and Mukherjee, P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 1171 (1995).Google Scholar
15 Wagner, J., Ramsteiner, M., Wild, C., and Koidl, P., Phys. Rev. B 40, 1817 (1989).Google Scholar
16 Shiao, J., and Hoffman, R. W., Thin Solid Films 283, 145 (1996).Google Scholar