Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:57:53.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-Conductance GaAs Tunnel Diodes by OMVPE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

R. Venkatasubramanian
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
M. L. Timmons
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
T. S. Colpitts
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Get access

Abstract

GaAs p+-n+ tunnel diodes have been grown by atmospheric-pressure organometallic vapor phase epitaxy (OMVPE) using zinc as the dopant for the p+ regions and either Se or Si as the dopant for the n+ regions. At a growth temperature of 700° C, using a “cycled” growth for just the Zn-doped p++-GaAs layer both the conductance and the peak current of the tunnel diode has been increased by a factor of ˜65. The conductance of the tunnel diode, maximized at a growth temperature of 650 °C with the cycled growth, is comparable to the best reported values by MBE. Cycled growths for n+ Se-doped regions reduce the tunnel-diode conductance by more than two orders of magnitude. However, the cycled growth for n+-GaAs regions formed with Si doping shows no conductance degradation. A model for these observations is presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bedair, S.M., Hutchby, J.A., Chiang, J.P.C., Simons, M., and Hauser, J.R., Proc. of the 15th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf. (IEEE, New York, 1982), p.692.Google Scholar
2. Olson, J.M., Kurtz, S.R., Kibbler, A.E., and Faine, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 623 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. DiLorenzo, J.V. and Khandelwal, D.D., “GaAs FET Principles and Technology”, Artech House, Dedham, Massaschsetts, 646 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Sze, S.M., “Physics of Semiconductor Devices”, 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York (1981).Google Scholar
5. Venkatasubramanian, R., Timmons, M.L., and Colpitts, T.S., To be Published.Google Scholar
6. Field, R.J. and Ghandhi, S.K., J. Cryst. Growth, 74, 551 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Luque, A., Martin, J., and Arujo, G.L., J. Electrochem. Soc., 123, 249 (1976).Google Scholar
8. Kuech, T.F., Tischler, M.A., Potemski, R., Cardone, F., and Scilla, G., J. Cryst. Growth, 98, 174 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Hurle, D.T.J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 40 (1979) 627.Google Scholar
10. Venkatasubramanian, R., Ghandhi, S.K., Kuech, T.F., J. Cryst. Growth, 97, 827 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Mathur, G., Ph.D Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY (1985).Google Scholar
12. Venkatasubramanian, R., Patel, K. and Ghandhi, S.K., J. Cryst. Growth, 94, 34 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Ghandhi, S.K., Huang, R.T., and Borrego, J.M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 48, 415 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Miller, D.L., Zehr, S.W., and Harris, J.S. Jr., J. Appl. Phys., 53, 744 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar