Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:03:02.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High Temperature Creep Behavior of Single Crystal Gammpraime and Gamm Laloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

M. V. Nathal ,
J. O. Diaz  and
R. V. Miner
M. V. Nathal
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 44135
J. O. Diaz
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 44135
R. V. Miner
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 44135
Get access

Abstract

The creep behavior of single crystals of γ′ and γ alloys were investigated and compared to the response of two phase superalloys tested previously. High temperature deformation in the γ alloys was characteristic of a climb controlled mechanism, whereas the γ′ based materials exhibited glide controlled creep behavior. The superalloys were much more creep resistant than their constituent phases, which indicates the importance of the γ-γ′ interface as a barrier for dislocation motion during creep.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 133: Symposium H – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys III , 1988 , 269
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nix, W.D. and Ilschner, B., in 5th Int. Conf. Strength of Metals and Alloys, ed. by Hassen, P., et al., Pergamon Press, 3, 1980, p. 1503.Google Scholar
2. Copely, S.M. and Kear, B.H., Trans. TMS-AIME, 239, 1967, p.984 Google Scholar
3. Davies, R.G. and Johnson, T.L., in Proc. 3rd Bolton Landing Conf. on Ordered Alloys, ed. by Kear, B. H. et al., Claitors, Baton Rouge, 1970, p. 447.Google Scholar
4. Pope, D.P. and Ezz, S.S., Int. Metals Reviews, 29, 1984, p. 136 Google Scholar
5. Nathal, M.V. and Ebert, L.J., Metall. Trans., 16A, 1985, p. 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. MacKay, R.A. and Nathal, M.V., in MiCon 86: Optimization of Processing, Properties, and Service Performance Through Microstructural Control, ASTM STP979, ed. by Bramfitt, B. L. et al., 1988, p. 202.Google Scholar
7. Nathal, M.V. and Ebert, L.J., Metall. Trans., 16A, 1985, p. 1849 and p. 1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Nathal, M.V., Metall. Trans., 18A, 1987, p. 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Davies, C.K.L., Davies, P.W., and Wilshire, B., Phil. Mag., 12, 1965, p. 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Johnson, W.R., Barrett, C.R. and Nix, W.D., Metall. Trans., 3, 1972, p. 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Schneibel, J.H. and Horton, J.A., J. Mater. Res., 3, 1988, p. 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Shah, D.M., Scripta Metall., 17, 1983, p. 997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Sherby, O.G., Klundt, R.H., and Miller, A.K., Met. Trans., 8A, 1977, p. 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Weertman, J. and Shahinian, B., Trans. TMS-AIME, 206, 1956, p.1223.Google Scholar