Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:19:12.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth Morphologies of Steps on Vicinal Surfaces in Molecular-Beam Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Rong-Fu Xiao
Rong-Fu Xiao*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, the Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Get access

Abstract

A Monte Carlo model has been used to study growth morphologies of steps on vicinal surfaces in molecular-beam epitaxy. The model accounts for molecule attachment, detachment, and surface diffusion. Through variation of surface temperature, impingement rate of source molecules, and the orientation of vicinal surface, we have explored the surface diffusion and the conditions under which two dimensional nucleation (2DN) growth and step flow (SF) growth occur. We have found optimum growth windows for 2DN growth and SF growth. For SF growth we have found that morphological stabilitity of steps are closely dependent on their step height. Steps with multi-molecular-layers are seen to be less stable than single-layer steps in a surface diffusion field, due to a decrease in the attachment of growth units from the upper terrace.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 280: Symposium B – Evolution of Surface and Thin Film Microstructure , 1992 , 299
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Tanaka, M., Suzuki, T., and Nishinaga, T., J. Crystal Growth 111, 168 and 173 (1991) and reference therein.Google Scholar
[2] Tung, R.T., and Schrey, F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1277 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Burton, W.K., Cabrera, N., and Frank, F.C., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 243, 299 (1951).Google Scholar
[4] Bales, G.S., and Zangwill, A., Phys. Rev. B 41, 5500 (1990).Google Scholar
[5] Myers-Beaghton, A.K., and Vvedensky, D.D., Phys. Rev. A 44, 2457 (1991).Google Scholar
[6] Ghez, R., and Cohen, H.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1977 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Lovisa, M.F., and Ehrlich, G., Surf. Sci. 246, 43 (1991), and reference therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Kellogg, G.L., Surf. Sci. 246, 31 (1991).Google Scholar
[9] Neave, J.H., Dobson, P.J., and Joyce, B.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 100 (1985).Google Scholar
[10] Sunagawa, I.. and Bennema, P.. in Preparation and Properties of Solid State Materials Vol. 7, edited by Wilcox, W. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982), pp. 1.Google Scholar
[11] Xiao, R.-F., Alexander, J.I.D., and Rosenberger, F., Phys. Rev. A 43, 2977 (1991).Google Scholar
[12] Xiao, R.-F., submitted to Appl. Phys. LettGoogle Scholar
[13] Gilmer, G.H., and Bennema, P., J. Appl. Phys. 43, 1347 (1972).Google Scholar
[14] Gilmer, G.H., and Jackson, K.A., in Current Topics in Materials Science. Vol. 2. edtied by Kaldis, E. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 79.Google Scholar
[15] Phillips, R., and Chrzan, D.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 220 (1991).Google Scholar