Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T03:52:01.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and Characterization of Magnetooptic Garnet Films with Planar Uniaxial Anisotropy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Vincent J. Fratello ,
Irina Mnushkina ,
Steven J. Licht  and
Robert R. Abbott
Vincent J. Fratello
Affiliation:
Integrated Photonics, Inc., 132 Stryker Lane Hillsborough, NJ 08844–1937, U.S.A.
Irina Mnushkina
Affiliation:
Integrated Photonics, Inc., 132 Stryker Lane Hillsborough, NJ 08844–1937, U.S.A.
Steven J. Licht
Affiliation:
Integrated Photonics, Inc., 132 Stryker Lane Hillsborough, NJ 08844–1937, U.S.A.
Robert R. Abbott
Affiliation:
Integrated Photonics, Inc., 132 Stryker Lane Hillsborough, NJ 08844–1937, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Thick film garnet Faraday rotators with perpendicular anisotropy have limited utility for variable polarization rotation applications because multi-domain effects result in large effective insertion losses in device applications. Thick film growth of (BiGdLu)3(FeGaAl)5O12 on (100) substrates yields growth-induced anisotropies ranging from positive anisotropy perpendicular domains to negative anisotropy in-plane domains. Planar domains show variable magnetization by domain rotation with a uniform projection of magnetization along the axis of light propagation. This can produce low-loss devices when operated in sub-saturation applications such as magnetic field sensors, variable optical attenuators and polarization controllers.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 834: Symposium J – Magneto-Optical Materials for Photonics and Recording , 2004 , J6.2
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fratello, V. J. and Wolfe, R. “Epitaxial Garnet Films for Nonreciprocal Magneto-Optic Devices, ” Magnetic Film Devices, ed. Francombe, M. H. and Adam, J. D., Volume 4 of Handbook of Thin Film Devices: Frontiers of Research, Technology and Applications, (Academic Press, 2000), pp. 93–141.Google Scholar
2. Butrim, V. I., Vishnevskii, V. G. and Dubinko, S. V., Tech. Phys. 46, 427 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Hansen, P., “Magnetic Anisotropy and Magnetostriction in Garnets” Physics of Magnetic Garnets, ed. Paoletti, A., (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978) pp. 56–133.Google Scholar
4. Callen, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 18, 311 (1971).Google Scholar
5. Rosencwaig, A., Tabor, W. J. and Pierce, R. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 779 (1971).Google Scholar
6. Hansen, P. and Krumme, J.-P., Thin Solid Films 114, 69 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Novak, P., Czech. J. Phys. B 34, 1060 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Gyorgy, E. M., Sturge, M. D., Van Uitert, L. G., Heilner, E. J. and Grodkiewicz, W. H., J. Appl. Phys. 44, 438 (1973).Google Scholar
9. Fratello, V. J., Slusky, S. E. G., Brandle, C. D. and Norelli, M. P., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 2488 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Hansen, R. and Witter, K., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 454 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Fratello, V. J., Slusky, S. E. G., Rana, V. V. S., Brandle, C. D. and Ballintine, J. E., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 564 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Wolfe, R., Fratello, V. J. and McGlashan-Powell, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 1221 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Grechishkin, R. M., Goosev, M. Yu., Il'Yashenko, S. E. and Neustroev, N. S., J. Magn. and Magn. Mat. 157, 305 (1996).Google Scholar
14. Helseth, L. E., Solovyev, A. G., Hansen, R. W., Il'Yashenko, E. I., Baziljevich, M. and Johansen, T. H., Phys. Rev. B 66, 064405 (2002).Google Scholar
15. Hansen, R. W., Helseth, L. E., Solovyev, A., Il'Yashenko, E. and Johansen, T. H., J. Magn. and Magn. Mat. 272–276, 2247 (2004).Google Scholar
16. Fratello, V. J., Mnushkina, I. and Licht, S. J. in Magneto-Optical Imaging, edited by Johansen, T. H. and Shantsev, D. V., (Kluwer, 2004) pp. 311–318.Google Scholar
17. Keszei, B., Vértesy, Z. and Vértesy, G., Crystal Res. Tech. 36, 953 (2001).Google Scholar
18. Dötsch, H., Klank, M., Hagedorn, O., Holthaus, C. Shamonin, M. and Trifonov, A. in Magneto-Optical Imaging, edited by Johansen, T. H. and Shantsev, D. V., (Kluwer, 2004) pp. 301309.Google Scholar
19. Klank, M., Hagedorn, O., Shamonin, M. and Dötsch, H., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 6484 (2002).Google Scholar
20. Iida, S., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 22, 1201 (1967).Google Scholar
21. Wood, D. L. and Remeika, J. P. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 1038 (1967).Google Scholar
22. Heilner, E. J. and Grodkiewicz, W. H., J. Appl. Phys. 44, 4218 (1973).Google Scholar