Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:34:07.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growing Pseudomorphic Layers Beyond the Critical Thickness Using Free-Standing Compliant Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

C.L. Chua
Affiliation:
Cornell University, School of Electrical Engineering, Ithaca, NY 14853
W.Y. Hsu
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Department of Material Science, Ithaca, NY 14853
F. Ejeckam
Affiliation:
Cornell University, School of Electrical Engineering, Ithaca, NY 14853
A. Tran
Affiliation:
Cornell University, School of Electrical Engineering, Ithaca, NY 14853
Y.H. Lo
Affiliation:
Cornell University, School of Electrical Engineering, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

We demonstrated the high quality growth of exceedingly thick pseudomorphic layers on free-standing, compliant substrates using InGaAs and GaAs materials. A 1% compressively strained InGaAs layer was grown on a relaxed GaAs platform by MBE. We fabricated the 800 Å-thick compliant platforms before growing a lattice-mismatched layer that exceeds its critical thickness by about twenty times.

X-ray analysis confirms a shift in the InGaAs peaks grown on the compliant substrate. Such shifts are characteristic of strained layers. Atomic Force Microscope analysis verifies that the layers on compliant substrates are much smoother than layers grown on a plain substrate.

Pseudomorphic growth exceeding the critical thickness has important applications in the design of various electronic and photonic devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Murakami, E., Nakagawa, K., Nishida, A., and Miyao, M., IEEE Electron Device Lett., 12, 71 (1991)Google Scholar
2 Zah, CE., Bhat, R., Cheung, K.W., Andreadakis, N.C., Fauire, F.J., Menocal, S.G., Yablonovitch, E., Hwang, D. M., Koza, M., Gmitter, T. J., and Lee, T. P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 1608(1990)Google Scholar
3 Lo, Y. H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 59, 2311 (1991)Google Scholar
4 Teng, D. and Lo, Y. H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 62,43 (1993)Google Scholar
5 Matthews, J. W., Mader, S., and Light, T. B., J. Appl. Phys., 41, 3800 (1970)Google Scholar
6 Dodson, B.W. and Tsao, J. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 1325 (1987)Google Scholar
7 Yablonovitch, E., Gmitter, T. J., Harbison, J. P., and Bhat, R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 2222 (1987)Google Scholar
8 Gräf, D., Grunder, M., Lüdecke, D., and Schulz, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 8, 1955 (May/ June 1990)Google Scholar