Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:12:09.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GMR, Structural, and Magnetic Studies in NiFeCo/Ag Multilayer thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J.D. Jarratt
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487–0202.
J.A. Barnard
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487–0202.
Get access

Abstract

Giant Magnetoresistance (GMR), crystal structure, and magnetic properties have been investigated in a series of sputtered Ni66Fe16Co18/Ag multilayer films with induced uniaxial anisotropy. The film thickness ranges studied were 20 and 25 Å for NiFeCo, and 25 to 50 Å for Ag. GMR was only evident in the films after post-deposition annealing. This onset of GMR is thought to be due to the breaking up of the NiFeCo layers into ferromagnetic platelets or islands by the immiscible Ag diffusing perpendicular to the film plane along the grain boundaries. The magnitude and field sensitivity of the GMR was dependent on the annealing time and temperature. High angle x-ray diffraction (HXRD) was used to reveal the overall film structure and growth texture and low angle XRD (LXRD) was used to investigate the quality of the multilayer structures. M-H hysteresis loops revealed in-plane uniaxial anisotropy in as-deposited films which is eventually eliminated with annealing. The easy axis squareness experiences a pronounced decrease with lower temperature annealing, but then increases slightly with annealing temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Hylton, T.L., Coffey, K.R., Parker, M.A., Howard, J.K., Science 261, 1021 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Slonczewski, J.C., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 129, L123 (1994).Google Scholar
[3] Rodmacq, B., Palumbo, G., Gerard, Ph., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 118, L11 (1993).Google Scholar
[4] Baibich, M.N., Broto, J.M., Fert, A., Nguyen Van Dau, F., Petroff, F., Eitenne, P., Creuzet, G., Friederich, A., Chazelas, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2472 (1988).Google Scholar
[5] Kitada, M., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 123, L18 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Jimbo, M., Kanda, T., Goto, S., Tsunashima, S., Uchiyama, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, L1348 (1992).Google Scholar
[7] Hossain, S., Seale, D., Qiu, G., Jarratt, J., Barnard, J.A., Fujiwara, H., Parker, M.R., J. Appl. Phys. 75 (10), in press (1994).Google Scholar