Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:23:31.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glass-Forming Liquids in Mesopores Probed by Solvation Dynamic and Dielectric Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

X. Yan
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut fur Polymerforschung, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
C. Streck
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut fur Polymerforschung, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
R. Richert
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut fur Polymerforschung, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The orientational dynamics of organic supercooled liquids of low molecular weight confined to the geometry of porous glasses are studied by two highly related techniques, the optical method of probing the dynamics of solvation regarding a chromophoric host molecule and dielectric relaxation spectroscopy. The dielectric results display marked effects of the confinement to mesopores in terms of altered structural dynamics which appear to separate into a raster and slower responses relative to the bulk liquid. We also demonstrate that there is no trivial relation between the ε*(ω) data and the liquid dynamics in these heterogeneous samples. These effects are partially paralleled by the solvation dynamics results, but with the spatial range inherent in the optical technique being inconsistent with associating the fast and slow dynamical components to spatially distinct regimes. We conclude on the slow component being a signature of non-ergodicity which arises from the competition between the length scale of cooperativity and the pore size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dynamics in Small Confining Systems II. edited by Drake, J.M., Klafter, J., Kopelman, R. and Troian, S.M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 366, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995).Google Scholar
2. Molecular Dynamics in Restricted Geometries, edited by Klafter, J. and Drake, J.M. (John Wiley, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
3. Israelachvili, J.N. and Kott, S.J., J. Chem. Phys. 88, 7162 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Arndt, M., Stannarius, R., Gorbatschow, W. and Kremer, F., Phys. Rev. E 54, 5377 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Schüller, J., Mel'nichenko, Y., Richert, R. and Fischer, E.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2224 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Schüller, J., Richert, R. and Fischer, E.W., Phys. Rev. B 52, 15232 (1995-1).Google Scholar
7. Yan, X., Streck, C. and Richert, R., Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 100, 1392 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Böttcher, C.J.F. and Bordewijk, P., Theory of Electric Polarization, Vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978).Google Scholar
9. Sillars, R.W., J. Inst. Electr. Eng. 80, 378 (1937).Google Scholar
10. Maroncelli, M., J. Mol. Liquids 57, 1 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Richert, R. in Disorder Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by Richert, R. and Blumen, A. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994).Google Scholar
12. Richert, R. and Wagner, H., J. Phys. Chem. 99, 10948 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Zhou, H.-X., Bagchi, B., Papazyan, A. and Maroncelli, M., J. Chem. Phys. 97, 9311 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Richert, R., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 6185 (1996).Google Scholar
15. Papazyan, A. and Maroncelli, M., J. Chem. Phys. 102, 2888 (1995).Google Scholar
16. Williams, G. and Watts, D.C., Trans. Faraday Soc. 66, 80 (1970).Google Scholar
17. Streck, C., Mel'nichenko, Y. and Richert, R., Phys. Rev. B 53, 5341 (1996-1);Google Scholar
Richert, R., Phys. Rev.B 54 (1996-II) 0000.Google Scholar
18. Donati, C. and Jäckle, J., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 2733 (1996).Google Scholar
19. Ngai, K.L. in Disorder Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by Richert, R. and Blumen, A. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994).Google Scholar
20. Donth, E., Relaxation and Thermodynamics in Polymers (Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1992).Google Scholar
21. Jäckie, J., private communication.Google Scholar
22. Hilfer, R., Phys. Rev. B 44, 60 (1991-1).Google Scholar