Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:15:08.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glass-Forming Ability and Crystallization Behavior in High-Density Bulk Metallic Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Laszlo J. Kecskes
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005–5069, USA
Samuel F. Trevino
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005–5069, USA
Robert H. Woodman
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005–5069, USA
Get access

Abstract

Alloys of composition (Hfx,Zr1-x)57Ti5Cu20Ni8Al10 and (Hfx,Zr1-x)52.5Ti5Cu17.9Ni14.6Al10, where x = 0, 0.2, 0.4. 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0, were evaluated for glass-forming ability, and the devitrification behavior on heating of the (Hfx,Zr1-x)52.5Ti5Cu17.9Ni14.6Al10 glasses was examined. Glass-forming ability was determined by suction casting 3-mm-diameter rods, followed by neutron diffraction examination. Results show that substitution of Hf for Zr in these alloys degrades glass-forming ability, and that this effect is more pronounced in compositions of the (Hfx,Zr1-x)57Ti5Cu20Ni8Al10 type. To examine devitrification behavior, thermal analysis was used to identify temperatures at which exothermic events occurred on heating in the (Hfx,Zr1-x)52.5Ti5Cu17.9Ni14.6Al10 series. The amorphous alloys were then subjected to annealing treatments corresponding to the exothermic events. Crystal structures formed during annealing were probedby neutron diffraction, and the size scale of features developed examined by small-angle neutron scattering. Results show that the initial decomposition produces a structure witha characteristic length scale, but it is not yet possible to comment on the mechanism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bruck, H. A., Rosakis, A. J., and Johnson, W. L., J. Mater. Res. 11, 503, (1996).Google Scholar
2. Magness, L. S., in Tungsten & Tungsten Alloys – 1992, edited by Bose, A. and Dowding, R. J., (Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1993), pp. 1522.Google Scholar
3. Gu, X., Xing, L.-Q., and Hufnagel, T. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 311, 77 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Lin, X. H. and Johnson, W. L., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 6514 (1995)Google Scholar
Davies, H. A., in Rapidly Quenched Metals III, edited by Cantor, B. (Metals Society, London, 1978), Vol. 1, pp. 121.Google Scholar
5. Xing, L. Q., Ochin, P., Harmelin, M., Faudot, F., Bigot, J., and Chevalier, J. P., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 220, 155, (1996).Google Scholar
6. Warren, B. E., X-ray Diffraction, (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1969), pp. 120123 Google Scholar
7. Pope, M. I. and Judd, M. D., Differential Thermal Analysis, (Heyden, Bellmawr, N.J., 1977), pp. 156165.Google Scholar
8. Feigin, L. A. and Svergum, D. I., Structure Analysis by Small-Angle X-Ray and Neutron Scattering, (Plenum Press, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
9. Hufnagel, T. C., Gu, X., and Munkholm, A., Mater. Trans. 42, 562 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Loffler, J. F. and Johnson, W. L., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 304–306, 670 (2001).Google Scholar
11. Schneider, S., Thiyagarajan, P., and Johnson, W. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 493 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Loffler, J. F., Bossuyt, S., Glade, S. C., Johnson, W. L., Wagner, W., and Thiyagarajan, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 525 (2000).Google Scholar
13. Trevino, S.F., Jourban, R., Parris, N., and Berk, N. F., Langmuir, 10, 2547, (1994).Google Scholar