Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:02:52.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Geometry of Dla: Different Aspects of the Departure from Self-Similarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

B.B. Mandelbrot
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06520-8283, USA
A. Vespignani
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06520-8283, USA
H. Kaufman
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06520-8283, USA
Get access

Abstract

In order to understand better the morphology and the asymptotic behavior in Diffusion Limited Aggregation (DLA), we studied a large numbers of very large off-lattice circular clusters. We inspected both dynamical and geometric asymptotic properties, namely the moments of the particle's sticking distances and the scaling behavior of the transverse growth crosscuts, i.e., the one dimensional cuts by circles. The emerging picture for radial DLA departs from simple self-similarity for any finite size. It corresponds qualitatively to the scenario of infinite drift starting from the familiar five armed shape for small sizes and proceeding to an increasingly tight multi-armed shape. We show quantitatively how the lacunarity of circular clusters becomes increasingly “compact” with size. Finally, we find agreement among transverse cuts dimensions for clusters grown in different geometries, suggesting that the question of universality is best addressed on the crosscut.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Witten, T.A. and Sander, L.M., Phys.Rev.Lett. 47, 1400 (1981).Google Scholar
[2] Niemeyer, L., Pietronero, L. and Wiesmann, H.J., Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 1038 (1984).Google Scholar
[3] Vicsek, T., Fractal Growth Phenomena, World Scientific, Singapore (1992).Google Scholar
[4] For a recent review see Vicsek, T., Schlesinger, M. and Matsushita, M., proceedings of Fractals in Natural Science: International Conference on the Comple Geometry of Nature, World Scientific, Singapore (1994).Google Scholar
[5] Meakin, P., in “Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena” Vol. 12, edited by Domb, C. and Lebowitz, J., Academic Press, N.Y. (1988).Google Scholar
[6] Mandelbrot, B.B. Physica A 191, 95 (1992).Google Scholar
[7] Ossadnik, P., Physica A 195, 319, (1993).Google Scholar
[8] Voss, R., Fractals, 1, 141 (1993).Google Scholar
[9] Mandelbrot, B.B., Kaufman, H., Vespignani, A., Yekutieli, I. and Lam, C.H., to be published (1994).Google Scholar
[10] Kaufman, H., Mandelbrot, B.B. and Vespignani, A., in preparation (1994).Google Scholar
[11] Yekutieli, Y., Mandelbrot, B.B. and Kaufman, H., J. Phys. A 27, 275 (1994).Google Scholar
[12 Pietronero, L., Erzan, A. and Evertsz, C., Phys.Rev.Lett. 61, 861 (1988). For a recent review see: A. Erzan, L.Pietronero and A.Vespignani: The Fixed Scale Transformation Approach to Fractal Growth, Review of Modem Physics, submitted (1994).Google Scholar
[13] Halsey, T.C. and Leibig, M., Phys. Rev.A 46, 7793 (1992).Google Scholar