Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:34:07.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GaAs Total Energy Tight Binding Hamiltonians for use in Molecular Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Jeremy Broughton
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
Mark Pederson
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
Dimitrios Papaconstantopoulos
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
David Singh
Affiliation:
NRC/NRL Post Doctoral Associate
Get access

Abstract

A self-consistent non-orthogonal semi-empirical tight binding Hamiltonian is proposed for GaAs, or any sp system, which is simple, reliable, transferable, accurate and fast to evaluate. Matrix elements are functions of charges, distances between atoms and simple cosines of angles between s and p-electron densities and interatomic vectors which maintain the simplicity of Slater-Koster parameterizations. The tight binding scheme is fit against a large data base of local density functional derived total energies for systems of differing coordination and geometry. The Hamiltonian fulfills the correct Virial constraint, invokes the physically correct relationship between overlap and kinetic energy matrix elements and defines charges via Mulliken or Löwdin schemes. Such Hamiltonians will allow the reliable simulation of statistical mechanically interesting systems of order hundred or more atoms over physically useful periods of time of order tens to hundreds of thousands of time steps within not unreasonable supercomputer budgets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stillinger, F. H. and Weber, T.A., Phys. Rev. B31, (1985), 5262.Google Scholar
2. Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, (1985), 632.Google Scholar
3. Chelikowsky, J. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, (1988), 2669.Google Scholar
4. Biswas, R. and Hamann, D.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, (1985), 2001.Google Scholar
5. Car, R. and Parrinello, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, (1985), 2471.Google Scholar
6. Vanderbilt, D., APS Bulletin 35, (1990), 238.Google Scholar
7. Rappe, A.M., Joannopoulos, J.D., Rabe, K.M. and Kaxiras, E., APS Bulletin 35, 1990), 239.Google Scholar
8. Sankey, O.F. and Niklewski, D.J., Phys. Rev. B40, (1989), 39979.Google Scholar
9. Harris, J., Phys. Rev. B31, (1985), 1770.Google Scholar
10. Kohn, W. and Sham, L.J., Phys. Rev. 140, (1965), A1133.Google Scholar
11. Dewar, M.J.S. and Thiel, W.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, (1977), 4899.Google Scholar
12. Slater, J.C. and Koster, G.F., Phys. Rev. 94, (1954), 1498.Google Scholar
13. Chadi, D.J., Phys. Rev. B29, (1984), 785.Google Scholar
14. Foulkes, W.M.C. and Haydock, R., Phys. Rev. B39, (1989), 12520.Google Scholar
15. Allen, P.B., Broughton, J.Q. and McMahan, A.K., Phys. Rev. B34, (1986), 859.Google Scholar
16. Khan, F.S. and Broughton, J.Q., Phys. Rev. B39, (1989), 3688.Google Scholar
17. Tomanek, D. and Schluter, M.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, (1986), 1055.Google Scholar
18. Pulay, P., Mol. Phys. 17, (1969), 197.Google Scholar
19. Mulliken, R.S., J. Chem. Phys. 23, (1955), 1833.Google Scholar
20. Lowdin, P.O., J. Chem. Phys. 18, (1950), 365.Google Scholar
21. Pederson, M.R., Klein, B.M. and Broughton, J.Q., Phys. Rev. B38, (1988), 3825.Google Scholar
22. Gordon, R.G. and Kim, Y.S., J. Chem. Phys. 56, (1972), 3122.Google Scholar